Why would they not? They created the ORC license

Excellent read. I’ve seen a few things from Andrew Sage before, but haven’t read much of it.

I have an android TV, but there’s obvious problems there too.

This is really neat. Feels like something from the StumbleUpon era, in a good way

We Have Fed You All for 1000 Years by Willi Carlisle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTlrMRLk8LQ

So we’re just giving out bonus actions now? /s

I think my tastes may lie a little closer to Americana Punk or something lol. Willi Carlisle is another artist I love and have considered recommending here as I’ve seen the activity here over the past days. The newest album Winged Victory is all great with queer socialist themes in almost every song.

Anyone here listen to Nick Shoulders? I wonder if he makes the grenre cut. Won’t Fence Us In may be a good intro for anyone looking to check him out. Its somewhat more explicitly anarchist than many of his other songs

The surge of Chinese accounts logging in during February is because of Chinese New Year, not bots. Most Chinese people get like two weeks off work for the holiday, so the number of Chinese people playing at gaming cafes (which are exclusively windows) spikes like that every year.

Looks fake

I see vital strike as more situational, where power attack is bread and butter for any str based melee PC. Vital strike can certainly be good, but generally I think power attack gives more damage per turn in more situations.

You mean Texarkana?

ALL power to the people ✊

Some of my friends use “yes them” jokingly to replace yes sir/yes ma’am. Certainly not correct in any grammatical way, but it does flow well enough and is kindof funny as long as the person being addressed doesnt mind.

Oopsie

Phone numbers havent been required for at least like a year or so

This gets into the tired argument of private property vs personal property. Leftists have long since solved this “problem”.

You can lock your door for personal security, but capitalist notions of land ownership are incompatible with collectivist societal structures.

Does every person not wish for the betterment of their lives and that of their community? When people’s needs are universally met, for what purpose would someone act out of greed or malice? And why do you suppose that a robust and flexible societal structure couldn’t handle such hypothetical bad actors appropriately? The practice of anarchic principles isnt some fictive utopia, but a process by which people (actual, real, living people right now) actively work to improve the lives of those around them.

Wtf? If that’s what you genuinely took away from my comment, I can only invite you to read theory. You clearly have a fundamental misunderstanding of what we’re discussing.

But if that delegate (and the council itself) has no more authority than the people they represent, anyone who feels their position isn’t being represented can raise the issue and represent themselves or their point of view. These types of systems are reliant on civic engagement far exceeding what most people in the western world would consider possible.

This is also part of why many anarchists make the distinction of just vs unjust hierarchy. Just hierarchy is when the respected elder or community organizer in a neighborhood represents the neighborhoods interest in the council, and has regular meetings with the people they represent to ensure all views are represented. Unjust hierarchy is when 51% of the 20% of the population that actually voted puts the person who invested the most money into their campaign in charge.

The point is to structure your society in a horizontal way such that no person or group of people has any degree of power greater than any other, and has no method of gaining greater power. As I’ve said elsewhere, there are miriad ways of accomplishing this, and each community tends to have solutions that work for them even if that solution wouldn’t work for another community.