Bold of you to assume that was a sin
Which commandments does it even violate?
I’m not religious but I find it funny how offended all the die hard atheists are because of religious rules. It’s symbols. Maybe the core of those is just to guide one through life with sound advice like endless desire and excess won’t lead to fulfilment and cause suffering like the well beloved bhudda says. Just because your relatives were religious nuts doesn’t mean it’s all pure mind control bullshit.
It is pure mind control though. You can argue that peaceful and civilized societies need individuals who repress and restrict themselves, morally or otherwise, to survive. But that doesn’t change the fact that religion is a mechanism to indoctrinate and assimilate repression. Pure and simple.
Nah after that he just wanted to die…
Jesus can get off his high horse. I bet he has a sordid browser history himself.
Mostly feet.
Rope play/shibari, for sure.
You know, it’s kind of refreshing to think that somebody tried to think of the most horrific sexual perversion imaginable, and could only come up with Waluigi hentai.
c/wholesome
The hardest thing to do is invent an entirely new perversion.
Also, how is that a sin?
You’re not supposed to have fun. Also you need to make a baby with every sperm. As explained by the Great Sages here:
It is central to most major religions the need to control the sex lives of their followers.
The Bible doesn’t say that masturbation is a sin, but since Christianity is a religion, they cannot permit their followers to control their own sex lives.
As a result, most sexual expression is considered a sin, and they will use any excuses or lies possible to make sure it stays that way.
To add to this, the most closely related passage in the bible is in Genesis 38, where this guy Onan was ordered to have children with his brother’s widow so the child could inherit his brother’s estate.
This seems to me a bit outside your usual family obligations, and so did the guy because while he engaged in sexual intercourse, he “spilled his seed” on the ground to avoid fulfilling this familial duty.
God didn’t think much of that and killed him on the spot.
The tale is usually linked more to the “sin” of contraception, but it seems like a much more pragmatic story: it’s best you knock up your brother’s widow than have everyone start a war over the spoils.
I always read it as being about defying the law (backed by divine enforcement):
His father commanded him to “… fulfill [his] duty to her as a brother-in-law to raise up offspring for [his] brother”, which implies that this was considered a legitimate obligation. His transgression, then, was that he pulled out “to keep from providing offspring for his brother”, actively refusing to fulfill that obligation. In that reading, it’s a tale about obeying the orders and customs of your elders.
Of course, these don’t have to be exclusive: “These norms exist for a reason, so you should damn well obey them.”
his brother’s widow
Tamar is an interesting character in her own right, and worthy of being named.
After this, she’s supposed to marry Judah’s (Onna’s dad’s) third son, but considering he just lost two, he doesn’t want it to go through. He sends her home to her parents and blows her off when she asks when the marriage is going to happen. (The Bible has a lot of verses about leaving parts of your field unharvested for widows. Not having a husband = hellish poverty.)
She eventually gets fed up with this, disguises herself as a temple prostitute, Judah shows up, has sex with her, and gives her a family emblem as an IOU.
Later, she ends up pregnant, so the village elders drag her before Judah for punishment (he’s her father-in-law still technically.) They are going to put her to death, and Judah asks her who knocked her up. She produces his family emblem, and he has to be “well, you got me, I guess I have to take care of you.
This seems to me a bit outside your usual family obligations
It was actually the law to do that, IIRC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yibbum
And the Lord sayeth, “creampie your sister-in-law or I’ll fucking kill you.”
Fun fact: In the Indigenous Australian society I’m most familiar with, if you’re a man and your brother dies, his wife is now your wife, and you have his familial obligations. This is to ensure that his family will be cared for.
They probably could have thought of worse, but then it goes from being funny to being depressing.
There are produced movies with far more sinister perversions than that.
The actual worst thing is probably known to and performed by a select few.
I was going to take a stab at guessing, but I realized I was doing too good a job and decided not to make anybody else read that.
He was probably relieved when the next sin would come up and would just be waluigi hentai again. In fact it was most likely waluigi hentai that made him reconsider when he was about to give up on humanity. Who knows?
He liked what he saw so much, so that he made a sacrifice for the beautiful things to continue their existence.
“Wait that’s gonna be an option?!? I’ve got to protect that!” - Jesus probably when he discovered his kink in the garden.
Jesus only saw Every Sin SO FAR…
This depends on what sect of Christianity you believe in. If you’re one that believes that everything is already predetermined, than yeah, this Jesus character would have seen everything to come, in regards of sin. If you don’t believe in a predetermined life, than you would have probably carried a huge burden of guilt for something that you never knew was true or not. But the people around you kept on speaking as if it was true, even though they wouldn’t or couldn’t provide solid evidence of such a thing happening.
Anyway… Do your best to be a good person, treat people how you would want to be treated, and don’t hold religion to be, the end all be all of life, as we know it. No one can fully prove or disprove the existence or absence of a deity or deities.
It being predetermined doesn’t necessarily decrease the anxiety. For example, you might just be one of the unelect, destined for hell.
Right, but Jesus is also God, so why would he need to “see” the things he’s already well aware of?
Oh that’s right, none of it makes any sense.
You’re assuming beating your dick to Waluigi railing Luigi in the ass is sinful
It shouldnt be. True love of consenting adult fictional characters can never be wrong.
Wait a minute.
Christianity literally started with him.
There were no sins or catholics before that.
So we owe it to him to be little perverts as much as we can or the sucker died for nothing.Just because there were no Catholics, that doesn’t mean that people weren’t violating some divine law (people also call it “natural law”). And unless you have a very specific meaning of “sin” in mind, there were absolutely “things you shouldn’t do or God will be angry”. Religion didn’t start with Jesus.
look at this guy taking the bullshitting seriously.
sins are a made up concept, like religion.
they don’t exist.
and since we were talking about the christian cult specifically that started with this guy.
other religious cults could’ve defined their sins like drinking alcohol,killing a snake or having sex with the wrong person.
the catholic sins were only defined later when they wrote their bible fantasy book.
so nobody sinned before that.
And since there is nothing as divine law there is nothing to violate.people also call it “natural law”
No they don’t.
natural law is the law of nature, that exists and has nothing to do with religious nonsense but instinct, which originated from evolution.
but of course, evolution is in itself a concept a patient suffering from religious mental disorder can’t grasp.Hmmm. Upvote or downvote? You make solid points. You are defending a position in good faith. Yet “mental disorder”?
Your mentality and eagerness to stake a position and defend the bastion hurts as much as helps.
catholic sins were only defined later
You are making an artificial distinction. Catholicism can be, but shouldn’t be viewed as a thing with a start. It’s part of a continuum. Judaism>Christianity>Islam. Catholic sins weren’t defined later. Like all culture, they evolved from earlier sins. Even calling them Abrahamic Religions as we do is making the same error. The tradition didn’t just emerge, it evolved from predecessors and it has descendants.
natural law is the law of nature, that exists and has nothing to do with religious nonsense but instinct, which originated from evolution.
Aside from the above linking culture, specifically religion to evolution in a real tangible way, please consider that natural selection over time takes random mutations and selects for reproductive fitness. It doesn’t care about what is “good” it only cares about what is most advantageous until new offspring can extend the continuity. We tend to think of this in terms of physiological of biochemical traits, but that’s a narrow view too. Our minds are a product of evolution. Our thinking is a product of our minds.
“Sin” is just part of a evolutionary cultural continuum that started somewhere in the roots of cognition where “actions>consequences” evolved and branched into “sin” and “karma”.
Creatures with evolved complex cognition need their complex social constructs to evolve to survive as well. They become condensed, efficient, easily axiomized artifacts like “the golden rule”, “religion”, philosophy, ethics, morality. All part of a continuum where divergence, convergence and speciation occur.
Religious and atheists are seperate cognitive sub-species who can choose to compete, fall into a predator-prey relationship (e.g. inquisition or communist religious purge) or we can coexist in our respective niches or, like all the best stuff in nature, become symbiotic and make the system better for all.
In short, not Religion vs Evolution. Religion as evolution. 😉👉
He could have been a giant sinning pervert himself, so he’s just saving his own.
Jesus Christ
Waluigi?
I’m too scared to look it up
Kept it fairly PG for you:
You’ll technically be “fine,” considering the image description is intended for comedic effect.
