They were carrying 2 tons of supply, so Cuba at least got something but that’s less than a truck can carry. I don’t know of any solar panel technology that could provide “5-10MW” that could be shipped in just 2 tons.

A1, where it’s always April Fools’.

A man after my own incompetence.

deleted by creator

Iran is going to receive support from China, North Korea, and Russia. Meanwhile those gulf allies have a merchant economy that relies on one single primary manufacturer for their bare-bone military and the rest of NATO isn’t joining in. They don’t need to get played when they are playing themselves.

You mean like my PC suddenly stops working when it doesn’t receive updates, or how it suddenly falls apart when the warranty goes out? Funny thing, the people tried to use the same argument when purchasing US planes to try to claim the opposite, that they would still be useful regardless of US attempts at intervention. Decide which is which, maybe?

Anyway, points aside, doesn’t stop from these theories actually existing, as your “All these backdoor fantasies” allude to, so I’m not sure whom you are trying to argue against since in this comment I’m not even pushing them. It’s just making a light-hearted jest that went “whoooosh” past you.

Guess we will know if these weapons have hidden backdoors to disable them soon enough. If anyone would trigger them for such a trivial disagreement, it’s Trump.

Trump’s ultimatums mean nothing when Iran realizes they are still going to escalate the conflict into a land invasion.

The only thing that makes the EU bureaucracy seem like it’s functional are competing national interests. When all nations are being targeted by foreign automated propaganda through their social networks to promote shifts in their governments to allow this sort of bull, it doesn’t even matter that the US is directly issuing threats against the EU, only just what corrupt long time career politicians can get out of it.

Dude, it’s just a single downvote. It wasn’t even made by anyone who bothered to make their own comment in the thread.

This study itself is bad, but it arguably promotes better studies to come out and nobody is doubting that AI data centers are just huge sources of heat radiation and energy consumption. The study you want takes time, effort, and will undoubtedly receive pushback . At the very least, it gave an excuse for CNN to talk about the issue.

Sort of a pull yourself by your own bootstraps problem, although there’s been more than enough opportunities. It’s just easier to blame society as a whole and do nothing except all the ways we’ve been told are the legitimate ways to protest - which don’t include prosecuting for treason and sedition.

deleted by creator

An entire industry’s worth of engagement algorithms.

And did they? I would have gone with refined uranium, that stuff is pretty valuable. I must have missed where they can carry the freight containers worth of solar panels you claim they are.

Span the World

Being that some of those places have monarchies themselves, maybe protesters could get past the whole American anti-King culture this tries to rile up and focus on it being anti-authoritarian. Maybe even, anti-fascist? Whoops, on a list now.

j/k I’ve always been on a list

Strawman much?

Where’s Lavos when you need it.

I’m sorry, I cannot understand your comment.

It’s almost poetic that the country that has financed and created the AI slop problem to where it is now gets burned by it to this degree.

Since OP won’t make any effort to defend this, I will.

In these sort of cases, wouldn’t it be more appropriate for the court to fine the company the $22 million to the company, award a more appropriate stipend to the victim that does not actively promote and reward with wealth gaps, pay the lawyers, and to then allow her to be the executor with what’s left in regards to being able to be spent to prevent similar abuses from happening in the future, with the responsibility falling back to the judge if she does not want to be? She would then be limited in how she could spend that, but she could spend it however she wants for that purpose - create a political campaign, finance unions, etc.