hitmyspot, hitmyspot@aussie.zone
Instance: aussie.zone
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1
Comments: 1658
Posts and Comments by hitmyspot, hitmyspot@aussie.zone
Comments by hitmyspot, hitmyspot@aussie.zone
Given this was all predictable, why wasn’t that letter sent pre emptively. They should have asserted it before the claim was made. Now it seems reasonable to reschedule, so it’s just a further delay.
Hence their point about being the best of a bad bunch. Remember the people making decisions are people. A corporation has no soul and only seeks profit. People work for them and can make good decisions and be good people whomever they work for.
There were good people that worked for the nazis. Unless you think the cleaner, for instance of the Nazi headquarters cleaned as a way to speak evil.
However. I take your point. I just think that’s not what is the point of the discussion here and is no different to both sides being bad on politics. It lacks nuance.
Yes, he’d be working. You need a work permit. Also tourists often need visas too. However, for artists, they need a work visa to enter and work.
You’re looking at only the last few weeks. Historicallu, not so much. They have rejected monitoring. Rejected negotiating. Rejected reasonable terms that led to sanctions at multiple points.
Silencing dissent is logical but not creating martyrs in a culture that idolises them.
Clamping down on women for wearing what they choose with violence is not logical. It’s consistent with their ideology, which is my point. The ideology supersedes logic.
In the case of ideology overriding logic, that could lead to use against Israel. Or even the suggestion could cause Israel to strike first as happened this time.
Their support of multiple factions in multiple neighbouring countries targeting than working constructively is also illogical and inflammatory
They released a statement saying it was not political. However, I think holding on shore is at least a bit political.
I’ve seen some of what you’re talking about, but it’s all seemed to be large finds and large investors. The link you sent is a show not an article. Do you have anything else. Not available in my area.
All articles I’ve seen, it doesn’t seem to be mom and pop investors but certainly it is being packaged more, which could attract retail investors. Things like pension funds, od expect them to invest in a broad range of more complex assets. So that’s not really concerning unless they are over invested.
Yes, I agree with your logic. However, Iran is a fundamentalist regime. They appear rational next to trump. That doesn’t make them rational. Otherwise there would have been an end to sanctions years ago. And an end to murdering dissidents and protestors.
Yes, it likely that makes it at least as valuable, but probably more so, given it mattered enough to sell.
The way it is phrased, I think they made a gain of that amount when they sold it. So the value had increased significantly since they purchased it. However, if they bought the equivalent amount again, it would cost the same. If they bought higher quality gold, possibly it would cost more.
Sorry, do you mean small investors are lending to companies? Through financial products? That are highly exposed to ai?Or any bubbble? I don’t know that I’ve seen this reported. What are you referring to?
Lol, no. The world is safer with less nukes. Allowing Israel to get nukes was a failure of the international community.
Allowing Ukraine to face repurcussions for giving up their nukes was another failure.
Wellz the more he does it, the more he’s burning allies and the more gas prices suffer, which is what destroys American politicians more than any other silly little crimes like rape, paedophilia or genocide.
If he plays too hard and loose, people might get angry enough that they face consequences. So far no indication of that happening.
Most of the large ai companies are still privately held by the wealthy. If he pops the bubble before they have a chance to leave retail investors holding the bag, then he might face consequences.
No,.it’s not all new material. Bit it’s a lot of inoffensive slop. Most places have declared the sitcom dead for that reason.
Nobody reads the terms and conditions. Likely a few put it through ai, and it didn’t notice either.
Or hid it, maliciously. It’s so intelligent, it just wanted to limit it’s own liability.
It’s not the flights per se, but the worrying future it suggests.
Old Google could. Enshittified Google can’t.
I think it’s that they realize peak oil is over. The middle east is a geopolitical strategic position for energy, as the world is now finding out via Iran closing the SoH.
Israel realised that that is on the wane. Along with the next generations attitude towards their relationshipnwith Israel. Israel is going hard in now as they have a larger support from the USA. I fully expect that to naturally wind down due to internal US political change and global moves away from carbon fuel.
Sure, oil shocks would still bite, but nowhere near to the same level. It’s why the other oil production states are desperately trying to pivot to other industries. Iran has screwed that by making them unsafe. America doesn’t realize that by not protecting their allies there, in the same way they protect Israel, that they will lose them. Edit:typos
I think were pretty screwed either way. If they ramp down, Iran sees them as an existential threat and ramps up nuke capability, but now with less sanctions and more money. Iran with nukes makes Israel more twitchy as they see it as an existential threat.
If USA ramps up, we’re in for a long protracted war and instability.
So we’re screwed either way.
No, it’s not, it’s a single transferable vote. See Ireland.
Or garlic, or chili flakes or topped with hummus. Basically roast any vegetable with olive oil, season it and add some kind of flavour bomb and you’ll be good.
Given this was all predictable, why wasn’t that letter sent pre emptively. They should have asserted it before the claim was made. Now it seems reasonable to reschedule, so it’s just a further delay.
Hence their point about being the best of a bad bunch. Remember the people making decisions are people. A corporation has no soul and only seeks profit. People work for them and can make good decisions and be good people whomever they work for.
There were good people that worked for the nazis. Unless you think the cleaner, for instance of the Nazi headquarters cleaned as a way to speak evil.
However. I take your point. I just think that’s not what is the point of the discussion here and is no different to both sides being bad on politics. It lacks nuance.
Yes, he’d be working. You need a work permit. Also tourists often need visas too. However, for artists, they need a work visa to enter and work.
You’re looking at only the last few weeks. Historicallu, not so much. They have rejected monitoring. Rejected negotiating. Rejected reasonable terms that led to sanctions at multiple points.
Silencing dissent is logical but not creating martyrs in a culture that idolises them.
Clamping down on women for wearing what they choose with violence is not logical. It’s consistent with their ideology, which is my point. The ideology supersedes logic.
In the case of ideology overriding logic, that could lead to use against Israel. Or even the suggestion could cause Israel to strike first as happened this time.
Their support of multiple factions in multiple neighbouring countries targeting than working constructively is also illogical and inflammatory
They released a statement saying it was not political. However, I think holding on shore is at least a bit political.
I’ve seen some of what you’re talking about, but it’s all seemed to be large finds and large investors. The link you sent is a show not an article. Do you have anything else. Not available in my area.
All articles I’ve seen, it doesn’t seem to be mom and pop investors but certainly it is being packaged more, which could attract retail investors. Things like pension funds, od expect them to invest in a broad range of more complex assets. So that’s not really concerning unless they are over invested.
Yes, I agree with your logic. However, Iran is a fundamentalist regime. They appear rational next to trump. That doesn’t make them rational. Otherwise there would have been an end to sanctions years ago. And an end to murdering dissidents and protestors.
Yes, it likely that makes it at least as valuable, but probably more so, given it mattered enough to sell.
The way it is phrased, I think they made a gain of that amount when they sold it. So the value had increased significantly since they purchased it. However, if they bought the equivalent amount again, it would cost the same. If they bought higher quality gold, possibly it would cost more.
Sorry, do you mean small investors are lending to companies? Through financial products? That are highly exposed to ai?Or any bubbble? I don’t know that I’ve seen this reported. What are you referring to?
Lol, no. The world is safer with less nukes. Allowing Israel to get nukes was a failure of the international community.
Allowing Ukraine to face repurcussions for giving up their nukes was another failure.
Wellz the more he does it, the more he’s burning allies and the more gas prices suffer, which is what destroys American politicians more than any other silly little crimes like rape, paedophilia or genocide.
If he plays too hard and loose, people might get angry enough that they face consequences. So far no indication of that happening.
Most of the large ai companies are still privately held by the wealthy. If he pops the bubble before they have a chance to leave retail investors holding the bag, then he might face consequences.
No,.it’s not all new material. Bit it’s a lot of inoffensive slop. Most places have declared the sitcom dead for that reason.
Nobody reads the terms and conditions. Likely a few put it through ai, and it didn’t notice either.
Or hid it, maliciously. It’s so intelligent, it just wanted to limit it’s own liability.
It’s not the flights per se, but the worrying future it suggests.
Old Google could. Enshittified Google can’t.
I think it’s that they realize peak oil is over. The middle east is a geopolitical strategic position for energy, as the world is now finding out via Iran closing the SoH.
Israel realised that that is on the wane. Along with the next generations attitude towards their relationshipnwith Israel. Israel is going hard in now as they have a larger support from the USA. I fully expect that to naturally wind down due to internal US political change and global moves away from carbon fuel.
Sure, oil shocks would still bite, but nowhere near to the same level. It’s why the other oil production states are desperately trying to pivot to other industries. Iran has screwed that by making them unsafe. America doesn’t realize that by not protecting their allies there, in the same way they protect Israel, that they will lose them. Edit:typos
I think were pretty screwed either way. If they ramp down, Iran sees them as an existential threat and ramps up nuke capability, but now with less sanctions and more money. Iran with nukes makes Israel more twitchy as they see it as an existential threat.
If USA ramps up, we’re in for a long protracted war and instability.
So we’re screwed either way.
No, it’s not, it’s a single transferable vote. See Ireland.
Or garlic, or chili flakes or topped with hummus. Basically roast any vegetable with olive oil, season it and add some kind of flavour bomb and you’ll be good.