Feddit.onlinesomeguy3, someguy3@lemmy.world
Instance: lemmy.world
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 66
Comments: 2988
Posts and Comments by someguy3, someguy3@lemmy.world
c/politicalvideos
c/politicaldiscussion
c/politics
c/linux
c/asklemmy
c/showerthoughts
c/til
c/videos
c/nostupidquestions
c/world
Comments by someguy3, someguy3@lemmy.world
Jan. Iphone was launched June. Wondering if he thinking about dumb phones or BlackBerry with touch screen.
Science Memes@mander.xyz
I just watched a youtube video that they found a Roman shipwreck absolutely packed with lead ingots. They brought them up for use.
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world
Is this how I learn about this? Is it actually closed again?
Play this out:
1) Russia nukes the US.
2) In response, the US nukes Russia. Not just a little bit either, they nuke all population sites.
No “decapitation” strike is possible from either side. Any attack by either side is met by the other striking back, and again not just a little bit - all population sites. That is what mutually assured destruction is.
And maybe more if you need:
1) if you think the US nukes Russia, then:
2) surprise, Russia nukes the US back.
Once again, no decapitation strike is possible from either side. A strike by the US is met by Russia striking back. That is what mutually assured destruction is.
MAD literally works if either side starts nuking the other, regardless of the reason why. This is the whole basis of MAD.
Ok I’m really gonna peace out. You really need to do some reading.
First you said Russia, not the US, would do a preemptive nuclear attack. So this isn’t about Trump, it’s about Putin.
Second, Russia wouldn’t do it because of MAD. That’s the whole concept of MAD.
You’re making no sense, so I think I’m gonna peace out.
They consider Taiwan part of China. They would see nuking Taiwan as nuking their own left hand. Very unlikely.
MAD is when the other country can nuke you back. That doesn’t exist here. (As far as everyone knows.)
Preemptive attacks don’t work when they will nuke you back. This is the principle behind Mutually Assured Destruction.
pics
Unpopular Opinion…
It’s everywhere. Even in your reply with the capitalized “YOU”.
This is what fascism is, when the followers (Fox) want to give dear leader their power.
Folders.
You can extrapolate this to now that all search engines suck.
Memes of ProductionEveryone and their grandmother knows a war with Iran would mean Iran closing down the strait of Hormuz, so no one was about to do it. So no Harris wouldn’t have done it JFC. You can say they are an adversary without declaring war JFC. Only Trump is dumb enough to do it.
https://youtu.be/o0A9M5wHBA4
https://youtu.be/o0A9M5wHBA4
Jan. Iphone was launched June. Wondering if he thinking about dumb phones or BlackBerry with touch screen.
I just watched a youtube video that they found a Roman shipwreck absolutely packed with lead ingots. They brought them up for use.
1800 light years away.
Is this how I learn about this? Is it actually closed again?
So you’re just boring?
Play this out:
1) Russia nukes the US.
2) In response, the US nukes Russia. Not just a little bit either, they nuke all population sites.
No “decapitation” strike is possible from either side. Any attack by either side is met by the other striking back, and again not just a little bit - all population sites. That is what mutually assured destruction is.
And maybe more if you need:
1) if you think the US nukes Russia, then:
2) surprise, Russia nukes the US back.
Once again, no decapitation strike is possible from either side. A strike by the US is met by Russia striking back. That is what mutually assured destruction is.
MAD literally works if either side starts nuking the other, regardless of the reason why. This is the whole basis of MAD.
Ok I’m really gonna peace out. You really need to do some reading.
First you said Russia, not the US, would do a preemptive nuclear attack. So this isn’t about Trump, it’s about Putin.
Second, Russia wouldn’t do it because of MAD. That’s the whole concept of MAD.
You’re making no sense, so I think I’m gonna peace out.
They consider Taiwan part of China. They would see nuking Taiwan as nuking their own left hand. Very unlikely.
MAD is when the other country can nuke you back. That doesn’t exist here. (As far as everyone knows.)
Preemptive attacks don’t work when they will nuke you back. This is the principle behind Mutually Assured Destruction.
Why’s that?
…
It’s everywhere. Even in your reply with the capitalized “YOU”.
This is what fascism is, when the followers (Fox) want to give dear leader their power.
Took me a second.
Folders.
You can extrapolate this to now that all search engines suck.
Everyone and their grandmother knows a war with Iran would mean Iran closing down the strait of Hormuz, so no one was about to do it. So no Harris wouldn’t have done it JFC. You can say they are an adversary without declaring war JFC. Only Trump is dumb enough to do it.