Skip to content

Conversation

LDong-Arm
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of changes

As per our new directory restructure, this PR moves device_key from features into drivers and refactors its internal structure to

drivers
├── [...]
└── device_key
    ├── mbed_lib.json                                     
    ├── README.md
    ├── include
    │   └── device_key 
    │       └── DeviceKey.h
    ├── source
    │   └── DeviceKey.cpp
    └── tests
        └── TESTS

Impact of changes

None.

Migration actions required

None.

Documentation

None.


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers

@ARMmbed/mbed-os-core @rajkan01


Restructure device_key to have
* include/device_key - header
* source - source file
* tests/TESTS - Greentea test
@LDong-Arm LDong-Arm changed the title Refactor device key Refactor device_key Aug 14, 2020
@mergify mergify bot added the needs: work label Aug 14, 2020
@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Aug 14, 2020
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested review from a team and rajkan01 August 14, 2020 17:00
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@LDong-Arm, thank you for your changes.
@rajkan01 @ARMmbed/mbed-os-storage @ARMmbed/mbed-os-core @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@LDong-Arm LDong-Arm force-pushed the refactor_device_key branch from 65659e9 to e8c35f8 Compare August 17, 2020 08:49
@LDong-Arm LDong-Arm requested a review from rajkan01 August 17, 2020 08:49
@LDong-Arm LDong-Arm force-pushed the refactor_device_key branch from e8c35f8 to a59bace Compare August 17, 2020 09:14
Copy link
Contributor

@rajkan01 rajkan01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@LDong-Arm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@adbridge @0xc0170 Hi, this should be ready for CI, cheers

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: work labels Aug 24, 2020
@adbridge
Copy link
Contributor

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Aug 24, 2020

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_dynamic-memory-usage ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cloud-client-pytest ✔️

@adbridge adbridge merged commit 4ba1a54 into ARMmbed:master Aug 24, 2020
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.3.0 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Sep 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants