Skip to content

Translation mistake in the zh-tw scopes.md. #279

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2015
Merged

Translation mistake in the zh-tw scopes.md. #279

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2015

Conversation

lockys
Copy link
Contributor

@lockys lockys commented Mar 21, 2015

In the "When not used in an assignment, return statement or as a function argument, the {...} notation will get interpreted as a block statement and not as an object literal" paragraph, the meaning in the English ver. is different in the Chinese ver.
I think there are translation mistakes which may lead to misunderstanding in the zh-tw version, so I make some corrections in that paragraph. Please check that. Thanks :-)

In the "When not used in an assignment, return statement or as a function argument, the {...} notation will get interpreted as a block statement and not as an object literal" paragraph, the meaning in the English ver. is different in the Chinese ver.
I think there are translation faults which may lead to misunderstanding in the zh-tw version, so I make some corrections in that paragraph. Please check that. Thanks :-)
@lockys
Copy link
Contributor Author

lockys commented Mar 29, 2015

Excuse me, please aware of this problem. 😄

@peterjwest
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for that, I have to trust you on this!

peterjwest added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2015
Translation mistake in the zh-tw scopes.md.
@peterjwest peterjwest merged commit f759e51 into BonsaiDen:master Mar 31, 2015
@lockys
Copy link
Contributor Author

lockys commented Mar 31, 2015

Thanks for your effort. Hope that zh-tw version will be more readable and easy to understand gradually.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants