Skip to content

Conversation

rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Aug 5, 2014

This can substantially reduce memory usage during shuffle.

…b) to 32KB.

This can substantially reduce memory usage during shuffle.
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 5, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1781. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17930/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 5, 2014

QA results for PR 1781:
- This patch PASSES unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17930/consoleFull

@mridulm
Copy link
Contributor

mridulm commented Aug 5, 2014

We are running this with 8k or so :-)

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor

pwendell commented Aug 5, 2014

LGTM

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Aug 5, 2014

Thanks. Merging in master & branch-1.1.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2014
…b) to 32KB.

This can substantially reduce memory usage during shuffle.

Author: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>

Closes #1781 from rxin/SPARK-2503-spark.shuffle.file.buffer.kb and squashes the following commits:

104b8d8 [Reynold Xin] [SPARK-2503] Lower shuffle output buffer (spark.shuffle.file.buffer.kb) to 32KB.

(cherry picked from commit acff9a7)
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in acff9a7 Aug 6, 2014
@rxin rxin deleted the SPARK-2503-spark.shuffle.file.buffer.kb branch August 13, 2014 08:02
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
…b) to 32KB.

This can substantially reduce memory usage during shuffle.

Author: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1781 from rxin/SPARK-2503-spark.shuffle.file.buffer.kb and squashes the following commits:

104b8d8 [Reynold Xin] [SPARK-2503] Lower shuffle output buffer (spark.shuffle.file.buffer.kb) to 32KB.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants