Skip to content

Conversation

@mgielda
Copy link
Member

@mgielda mgielda commented May 15, 2025

This will be relevant to Caliptra SS implementers and I could not find a mention of this elsewhere here.

This will be relevant to Caliptra SS implementers and I could not find a mention of this elsewhere here.
@mgielda mgielda requested review from JohnTraverAmd and moidx May 15, 2025 12:47
@andreslagarcavilla
Copy link
Collaborator

@bharatpillilli I think we should replicate the Caliptra sybsystem compliance text into the main trademark audit process doc. Can you do that? If not I can

@syncsrc-nv
Copy link
Contributor

What's captured at https://github.com/chipsalliance/Caliptra/blob/main/doc/Caliptra.md#caliptra-subsystem-trademark-compliance lacks detail around subsystem integration requirements and does not describe which of the existing Caliptra-Core requirements are met by subsystem.

The current checklist is specific to Caliptra-Core v1.x. Updates are going to be needed for both Core v2.0 and Subsystem. I agree that the trademark compliance section should be moved though. My suggestion would be to create a parallel requirements checklist doc for subsystem and use this as the starting point for a 0.1 draft. That doc could then be linked in the policy doc (with appropriate disclaimers regarding it being work-in-progress).

@andreslagarcavilla
Copy link
Collaborator

Ok Once we get subsystem in place we will rev the tm policy to 2.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants