-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
docs: clarify PR review eligibility (#378) #395
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: clarify PR review eligibility (#378) #395
Conversation
Signed-off-by: electricplayer <[email protected]>
WalkthroughA new "Review eligibility" section was added to the documentation, detailing when CodeRabbit reviews pull requests for public and private repositories. The section introduces the Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate Unit Tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
docs/guides/code-review-overview.md (3)
19-19
: Consider clarifying section title
You might rename this heading to## Pull request review eligibility
for explicitness and consistency with other multi-PR contexts.
21-25
: Remove unnecessary Markdown line-breaks
The trailing two spaces on the first bullet item force an in-list line break, which isn't needed here. Removing them simplifies the markup without altering rendering.
26-26
: Evaluate placement ofProPlanNotice
If the notice is intended to highlight private-repo requirements specifically, consider embedding it within that bullet or wrapping it in an admonition for clearer context.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/guides/code-review-overview.md
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/guides/code-review-overview.md (1)
7-7
: Verify MDX import in.md
file
Ensure that Docusaurus is configured to process MDX imports in.md
-suffixed docs. If not, consider renaming this file to.mdx
. Also confirm that@site/src/components/ProPlanNotice.mdx
exists at the specified path.
Adds "Review eligibility" section to clarify which PRs CodeRabbit reviews.
Tackles #378