[V3] convert nodes_qwen.py to V3 schema

[bigcat88]

One node of two was tested after conversion(second node is almost the same):

git diff:

diff --git a/v3_object_info.json b/master_object_info.json
index 1e7b5ce..5e3cb67 100644
--- a/v3_object_info.json
+++ b/master_object_info.json
@@ -26342,8 +26342,7 @@
         "input": {
             "required": {
                 "clip": [
-                    "CLIP",
-                    {}
+                    "CLIP"
                 ],
                 "prompt": [
                     "STRING",
@@ -26355,12 +26354,10 @@
             },
             "optional": {
                 "vae": [
-                    "VAE",
-                    {}
+                    "VAE"
                 ],
                 "image": [
-                    "IMAGE",
-                    {}
+                    "IMAGE"
                 ]
             }
         },
@@ -26383,25 +26380,18 @@
         "output_name": [
             "CONDITIONING"
         ],
-        "output_tooltips": [
-            null
-        ],
         "name": "TextEncodeQwenImageEdit",
-        "display_name": null,
+        "display_name": "TextEncodeQwenImageEdit",
         "description": "",
         "python_module": "comfy_extras.nodes_qwen",
         "category": "advanced/conditioning",
-        "output_node": false,
-        "deprecated": false,
-        "experimental": false,
-        "api_node": false
+        "output_node": false
     },
     "TextEncodeQwenImageEditPlus": {
         "input": {
             "required": {
                 "clip": [
-                    "CLIP",
-                    {}
+                    "CLIP"
                 ],
                 "prompt": [
                     "STRING",
@@ -26413,20 +26403,16 @@
             },
             "optional": {
                 "vae": [
-                    "VAE",
-                    {}
+                    "VAE"
                 ],
                 "image1": [
-                    "IMAGE",
-                    {}
+                    "IMAGE"
                 ],
                 "image2": [
-                    "IMAGE",
-                    {}
+                    "IMAGE"
                 ],
                 "image3": [
-                    "IMAGE",
-                    {}
+                    "IMAGE"
                 ]
             }
         },
@@ -26451,18 +26437,12 @@
         "output_name": [
             "CONDITIONING"
         ],
-        "output_tooltips": [
-            null
-        ],
         "name": "TextEncodeQwenImageEditPlus",
-        "display_name": null,
+        "display_name": "TextEncodeQwenImageEditPlus",
         "description": "",
         "python_module": "comfy_extras.nodes_qwen",
         "category": "advanced/conditioning",
-        "output_node": false,
-        "deprecated": false,
-        "experimental": false,
-        "api_node": false
+        "output_node": false
     },
     "EmptyChromaRadianceLatentImage": {
         "input": {

[bigcat88]

+label: Core

[Kosinkadink]

Will merge this in afternoon of 9/27 PST to give node author some time.

[yamatazen]

Can Qwen Image Edit be used without input image?

[Kosinkadink]

It is now afternoon of 9/27 PST, merging