Skip to content

Conversation

jwakely
Copy link
Member

@jwakely jwakely commented Oct 17, 2025

Fixes NB US 182-296 (C++26 CD).

Fixes cplusplus/nbballot#871

@jwakely jwakely added the ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot label Oct 17, 2025
@Dani-Hub
Copy link
Member

There seems to be a typo "satisifes" in the new text

@jwakely
Copy link
Member Author

jwakely commented Oct 17, 2025

There seems to be a typo "satisifes" in the new text

Thanks, fixed now

@jwakely jwakely changed the title NB US 182-296 (C++26 CD): [simd.permute.static] use satisfies for sat… [simd.permute.static] use satisfies for sat… Oct 18, 2025
@jwakely jwakely changed the title [simd.permute.static] use satisfies for sat… [simd.permute.static] use satisfies for satisfaction Oct 18, 2025
@jensmaurer jensmaurer changed the title [simd.permute.static] use satisfies for satisfaction [simd.permute.static] Use satisfies for satisfaction Oct 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

US 182-296 29.10.8.8p2 [simd.permute.static] Clarify satisfaction checking

4 participants