Skip to content

Conversation

jwakely
Copy link
Member

@jwakely jwakely commented Oct 17, 2025

Fixes NB US 183-290 (C++26 CD).

Fixes cplusplus/nbballot#865

@jwakely jwakely added the ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot label Oct 17, 2025
@jwakely jwakely changed the title NB US 183-290 (C++26 CD): [simd.permute.mask] clarify list is in asce… [simd.permute.mask] clarify list is in asce… Oct 18, 2025
@jensmaurer jensmaurer changed the title [simd.permute.mask] clarify list is in asce… [simd.permute.mask] clarify list is in ascending order Oct 18, 2025
Comment on lines 18925 to 18926
\exposid{set-indices} be a list in ascending order of the index positions of \tcode{true}
elements in \tcode{selector}.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm sorry, I thought the proposal is to append "in ascending order".
As written, "of the index positions" applies to "order", but we want to continue to say "list of index positions".

Suggested change
\exposid{set-indices} be a list in ascending order of the index positions of \tcode{true}
elements in \tcode{selector}.
\exposid{set-indices} be a list of the index positions of \tcode{true}
elements in \tcode{selector}, in ascending order.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

US 183-290 29.10.8.10p5 [simd.permute.mask] Order of index positions

2 participants