Skip to content

[meta.reflection.layout,meta.reflection.annotation] Harmonize phrasing about complete types #8347

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+4 −4
Open

[meta.reflection.layout,meta.reflection.annotation] Harmonize phrasing about complete types #8347

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions source/meta.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5835,8 +5835,8 @@
direct base class relationship, or
data member description.
\item
If \tcode{dealias(r)} represents a type $T$,
there is a point within the evaluation context from which $T$ is not incomplete.
If \tcode{dealias(r)} represents a type,
then \tcode{is_complete_type(r)} is \tcode{true}.
\end{itemize}
\end{itemdescr}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -7032,8 +7032,8 @@
\item
\tcode{annotations_of(item)} is a constant expression and
\item
\tcode{dealias(type)} represents a type that is complete
from some point in the evaluation context.
\tcode{dealias(type)} represents a type and
\tcode{is_complete_type(type)} is \tcode{true}.
\end{itemize}
\end{itemdescr}

Expand Down