Skip to content

First attempt to fix failing test of #1103 #1104

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2021
Merged

First attempt to fix failing test of #1103 #1104

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2021

Conversation

Byron
Copy link
Member

@Byron Byron commented Jan 7, 2021

However, the test asserts on the provided context to be correct,
which is hard to do in this branch while it's easy to doubt the value
of this.

Lastly, there seems to be no way to ignore errors in git without
muting all output, which is in fact parsed.

Maybe it's possible to ignore errors while parsing the new kind of
error message.

It looks like one would have to parse stderr to understand what happened, maybe a code refactoring could do that.

However, the test asserts on the provided context to be correct,
which is hard to do in this branch while it's easy to doubt the value
of this.

Lastly, there seems to be no way to ignore errors in `git` without
muting all output, which is in fact parsed.

Maybe it's possible to ignore errors while parsing the new kind of
error message.
@Byron Byron marked this pull request as draft January 7, 2021 05:33
@Byron Byron merged commit 21e21d0 into master Jan 8, 2021
@Byron Byron added this to the v3.1.13 - Bugfixes milestone Jan 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant