-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 559
Add namespace To Context
#189
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add namespace To Context
#189
Conversation
|
Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA. It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@swcho Thanks for the contribution! Can you clarify your intended scope here? It looks like this will surface the |
|
@itowlson I think that's a reasonable feature to support, since I don't think we can/should set the default namespace in the client via this parameter, but making it available to users of the client library makes sense. @swcho you need to sign the CNCF CLA, also will you add a unit test to validate this behavior? Thanks! |
|
@itowlson It is somehow trivial change but as document described below Especially, on-premise kube cluster, not like kube cluster provisioned via major cloud vendor, My use case is below. And I just want to have @brendandburns Thank you all for having some time to review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some minor stylistic comments. But I think this would be a great addition.
Might even be nice to add an example showing the usage?
| readonly cluster: string; | ||
| readonly user: string; | ||
| readonly name: string; | ||
| readonly namespace?: string; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this not be just namespace like the others and set to undefined if not set?
| cluster: elt.context.cluster, | ||
| name: elt.name, | ||
| user: (elt.context.user ? elt.context.user : undefined), | ||
| namespace: elt.context.namespace || undefined, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we standise on one of the above to formats? Not sure which one is better though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|| syntax is fine with me, and agree standardization is good.
|
Sorry for late reply, I added simple test case for Thank you. |
Thanks Co-Authored-By: swcho <[email protected]>
|
/lgtm |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: brendandburns, swcho The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Thank you for your efforts on this project.
I'd like to add
namespaceinContextobject and properly parsed from configuration file.Thank you.