Skip to content

Conversation

skmanoj
Copy link
Member

@skmanoj skmanoj commented Aug 1, 2025

Replace by description of the work done

GitHub issue number

#106

Associated Risks

Replace by possible risks this pull request can bring you might have thought of

PR Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines
  • I have read the code of conduct guidelines
  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • 👌 Code hygiene
  • 🔭 Telemetry added, updated, or N/A
  • 📄 Documentation added, updated, or N/A
  • 🛡️ Automated tests added, or N/A

🧪 How did you test it?

image image

Replace with use cases tested and models used

@skmanoj skmanoj requested a review from a team as a code owner August 1, 2025 10:23
@skmanoj skmanoj changed the title Accepting expected result as a part of step instead of hardcoding Accepting expected result as a part of TestCase step instead of hardcoding Aug 1, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2025

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

Copy link
Contributor

@danhellem danhellem left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did we run and update the tests?

@skmanoj skmanoj merged commit 34b964d into main Aug 1, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TestPlan - test step expected results are hard coded - need to get them back from the prompt

2 participants