Skip to content

Conversation

@SpectatorNan
Copy link
Contributor

@SpectatorNan SpectatorNan commented Jun 28, 2025

What does this PR do?

update the error details response body content

Any background context you want to provide?

details docs:
https://developer.paypal.com/docs/api/orders/v2/#orders_create!c=400&path=details/field&t=response

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated error response details to include new fields for value and location, while removing name and message fields. Existing information such as issue, description, and links remains available.
  • Tests
    • Revised error response test cases to align with updated error detail fields and new JSON error examples.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The ErrorResponseDetail struct was updated by removing the Name and Message fields, introducing new fields Value and Location, and repositioning the Issue field below the new additions. The ErrorResponse struct gained a new Links field. The related unit test was modified to reflect these structural changes with updated JSON examples and assertions.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
types.go Modified ErrorResponseDetail: removed Name and Message, added Value and Location, repositioned Issue. Added Links []Link field to ErrorResponse.
unit_test.go Updated test TestTypeErrorResponseThree with new JSON error format; adjusted assertions for new fields Value, Location, Issue, and Links.

Poem

A struct once had a Name and tale,
But now new fields set sail—
With Value and Location clear,
The details shift, but never fear.
Issue stands, just moved below,
As code evolves, onward we go!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 663eb61 and 3c4471e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • types.go (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • types.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: test
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01eb901 and 0cfd831.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • types.go (1 hunks)

types.go Outdated
Comment on lines 731 to 733
Value string `json:"value"`
Location string `json:"location"`
Issue string `json:"issue"`
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

🧩 Verification correct

Verify the struct changes align with PayPal API documentation and assess breaking change impact.

The struct field modifications look syntactically correct, but this represents a significant breaking change:

Removed fields: Name and Message (as mentioned in AI summary)
Added fields: Value and Location
Repositioned: Issue field

Please verify this change matches the actual PayPal API documentation:

Additionally, search for existing usage of the removed fields:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for usage of removed ErrorResponseDetail fields that may break
# Expected: Find code that accesses .Name or .Message fields that will need updating

echo "Searching for usage of ErrorResponseDetail.Name field:"
rg -A 3 -B 3 "\.Name" --type go

echo -e "\nSearching for usage of ErrorResponseDetail.Message field:"  
rg -A 3 -B 3 "\.Message" --type go

echo -e "\nSearching for ErrorResponseDetail struct usage:"
rg -A 5 -B 2 "ErrorResponseDetail" --type go

Length of output: 6612


🌐 Web query:

PayPal Orders API v2 error response details structure for 400 errors

💡 Result:

PayPal Orders API v2 – Error Response Structure for 400 Errors

When you interact with the PayPal Orders API v2 and your request is invalid, you will typically receive an HTTP 400 status code. This indicates a client-side error, such as malformed JSON, missing required fields, or data that does not comply with the schema expected by the API[2][6].

Structure of 400 Error Response

A typical 400 error response from the PayPal Orders API v2 is a JSON object with the following fields:

  • name: A short code or identifier for the error (e.g., INVALID_REQUEST, VALIDATION_ERROR).
  • message: A human-readable message describing the error.
  • debug_id: A unique identifier for this error occurrence, useful for troubleshooting with PayPal support.
  • details: (Optional) An array providing granular details about the validation failures, such as which fields were problematic.
  • links: (Optional) An array of HATEOAS links with more information or documentation about the error[8][10].

Example Error Response

{
  "name": "INVALID_REQUEST",
  "message": "Request is not well-formed, syntactically incorrect, or violates schema.",
  "debug_id": "bd5e1ff1bd5b6",
  "details": [
    {
      "field": "/purchase_units/@reference_id=='1194780236'/items/0/category",
      "value": "",
      "issue": "INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE",
      "location": "body"
    }
  ],
  "links": [
    {
      "href": "https://developer.paypal.com/docs/api/orders/v2/#error-INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE",
      "rel": "information_link"
    }
  ]
}

[8][10]

Key Fields Explained

  • name: The error type, such as INVALID_REQUEST for bad input, or VALIDATION_ERROR for validation issues[10].
  • message: Plain language description of the problem[8][10].
  • debug_id: Allows PayPal support to trace the specific error event in their logs[8][10].
  • details: Each item details an issue, pointing to the exact field (using JSON Pointer notation), the problematic value, the nature of the issue (e.g., INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE, MISSING_REQUIRED_PARAMETER), and sometimes the location (typically "body")[8].
  • links: May include documentation or help URLs for specific errors[8].

Common Causes and Details

  • Malformed Request: The JSON is not properly structured or contains syntax errors.
  • Missing Required Fields: A necessary property is missing from the request object.
  • Incorrect Data Types: Provided data does not match the API schema (e.g., string when integer is expected).
  • Schema Violations: Values break schema rules, such as unsupported currency codes or invalid country codes[6][8][9].

Additional Notes

  • The error response structure is consistent for most validation and client errors (400 series), including business logic errors (such as mismatched totals)[5][8].
  • If the details array is present, examine each item for the exact field and reason for failure—this is crucial for debugging[8].

References for Troubleshooting

For more examples and troubleshooting guidance, see PayPal's official documentation:

  • [Orders v2 Error Reference][1]
  • [API Error Handling Guide][4][5]
  • [Understanding INVALID_REQUEST Errors][6]

Summary Table: Typical 400 Error Response Structure

Field Type Description
name string Error type identifier (e.g., INVALID_REQUEST)
message string Human-readable error description
debug_id string Unique debugging identifier
details array (Optional) Array of objects with validation issues
links array (Optional) Array of objects with documentation/help URLs

This structure helps developers identify exactly what went wrong in their request and where to start troubleshooting[8][10].

Citations:


Verify the struct changes align with PayPal API documentation and assess breaking change impact.

The struct field modifications look syntactically correct, but this represents a significant breaking change:

Removed fields: Name and Message (as mentioned in AI summary)
Added fields: Value and Location
Repositioned: Issue field

Please verify this change matches the actual PayPal API documentation:

PayPal Orders API v2 error response details structure for 400 errors

Additionally, search for existing usage of the removed fields:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for usage of removed ErrorResponseDetail fields that may break
# Expected: Find code that accesses .Name or .Message fields that will need updating

echo "Searching for usage of ErrorResponseDetail.Name field:"
rg -A 3 -B 3 "\.Name" --type go

echo -e "\nSearching for usage of ErrorResponseDetail.Message field:"  
rg -A 3 -B 3 "\.Message" --type go

echo -e "\nSearching for ErrorResponseDetail struct usage:"
rg -A 5 -B 2 "ErrorResponseDetail" --type go
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In types.go around lines 731 to 733, the struct fields for ErrorResponseDetail
have been changed by removing Name and Message, adding Value and Location, and
repositioning Issue. Verify these changes against the official PayPal Orders API
v2 error response documentation for 400 errors to ensure accuracy. Then, perform
a codebase search for any usage of the removed fields Name and Message to
identify and update all references accordingly to prevent breaking changes.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
unit_test.go (1)

149-152: Consider adding content to the links array for more comprehensive testing.

The links array is currently empty, which is valid but may not provide comprehensive test coverage. Consider adding at least one link object to ensure the Links field unmarshaling works correctly, similar to TestTypeErrorResponseOne.

                    "links": [
-
+                        {
+                            "href": "https://developer.paypal.com/docs/api/orders/v2/#error-TRACKING_NUMBER_ALREADY_EXIST",
+                            "rel": "related",
+                            "method": "GET"
+                        }
                    ]
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0cfd831 and 663eb61.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • unit_test.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
unit_test.go (1)
types.go (3)
  • ErrorResponse (739-746)
  • Name (1231-1238)
  • Details (718-726)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
unit_test.go (2)

138-154: JSON structure correctly updated to match new ErrorResponseDetail schema.

The JSON response has been properly updated to reflect the new ErrorResponseDetail struct fields (value, location) while removing the old ones (name, message). The structure aligns with PayPal's Orders API v2 documentation as stated in the PR objectives.


165-167: Assertions correctly updated for new struct fields.

The test assertions have been properly updated to validate the new ErrorResponseDetail fields:

  • Issue field verification retained
  • Value field added to check the new tracking number value
  • Description field verification retained
  • Removed checks for obsolete Name and Message fields

@plutov
Copy link
Owner

plutov commented Jul 10, 2025

Thank you @SpectatorNan can you also please move Links to ErrorResponse? Like here:

{
  "name": "ERROR_NAME",
  "message": "Error message.",
  "debug_id": "debug_ID",
  "details": [
    {
      "field": "field_name",
      "value": "value_passed",
      "location": "field_location",
      "issue": "problem_with_field",
      "description": "Error description."
    }
  ],
  "links": [
    {
      "https://error_documentation_link/",
      "rel": "information_link",
      "encType": "application/json"
    }
  ]
}

@SpectatorNan
Copy link
Contributor Author

SpectatorNan commented Jul 10, 2025

Thank you @SpectatorNan can you also please move Links to ErrorResponse? Like here:

{
  "name": "ERROR_NAME",
  "message": "Error message.",
  "debug_id": "debug_ID",
  "details": [
    {
      "field": "field_name",
      "value": "value_passed",
      "location": "field_location",
      "issue": "problem_with_field",
      "description": "Error description."
    }
  ],
  "links": [
    {
      "https://error_documentation_link/",
      "rel": "information_link",
      "encType": "application/json"
    }
  ]
}

I apologize, but I focused on the details and overlooked the links.

Copy link
Owner

@plutov plutov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @SpectatorNan

@plutov plutov merged commit 1ab7993 into plutov:master Jul 11, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants