Skip to content

[3.11] gh-101135: Add backwards compatibility to Windows launcher for older 32-bit versions (GH-101138) #101290

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2023

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jan 24, 2023

Python 2.x and up to 3.4 did not contain the "-32" in their registry name, so the 32 and 64-bit installs were treated equal. Since 3.5/PEP 514 this is no longer true, but we still want to detect the EOL versions correctly in case people are still using them.

Additionally, the code to replace a node with one with a lower sort key was buggy (wrong node chosen, replace never happened since parent was always NULL, replaced node never freed, etc)
(cherry picked from commit daec3a4)

Co-authored-by: Martin Boisvert [email protected]

…older 32-bit versions (pythonGH-101138)

Python 2.x and up to 3.4 did not contain the "-32" in their registry name, so the 32 and 64-bit installs were treated equal. Since 3.5/PEP 514 this is no longer true, but we still want to detect the EOL versions correctly in case people are still using them.

Additionally, the code to replace a node with one with a lower sort key was buggy (wrong node chosen, replace never happened since parent was always NULL, replaced node never freed, etc)
(cherry picked from commit daec3a4)

Co-authored-by: Martin Boisvert <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: 6 of 9 required status checks are expected..

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 5a8ed01 into python:3.11 Jan 24, 2023
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-daec3a4-3.11 branch January 24, 2023 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants