-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.4k
replace term 'EM' to 'SVD based approach' #14539
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Can you please explain your change? |
|
the method with EM algorithm is in BRML 2017 p.448-449. generally should calculate posterior distributions of hidden variable each observation data in E-step, i can't see calculating the posterior dist of hidden variable in a E-step and i think that the method of this implementation is "SVD-based approach", not "EM algorithm". (maybe "EM" you say is actually just "MLE(Maximize Likelihood Estimation)" ?) |
| tol : float | ||
| Stopping tolerance for EM algorithm. | ||
| Stopping tolerance for SVD based approach. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's definitely not a stopping tolerance for the svd. It's tolerance of the log likelihood that is being maximised by em
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i don't know whether this description is exact or not.
however, because SVD based approach also need to iterate, i think it need this stop tolerance.
do you have a idea for better description ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"Stopping tolerance for log-likelihood increase"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think that's fine. should i change it ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please do if you think it's good
|
@Cartman0 ok, looked it up, I agree! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise this is fine by me
|
Thanks @Cartman0 |
Reference Issues/PRs
replaced term "EM" -> "SVD based approach" for #14317 .
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Any other comments?