Skip to content

Radix sort #28

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
May 29, 2018
Merged

Radix sort #28

merged 13 commits into from
May 29, 2018

Conversation

robtaussig
Copy link
Contributor

Let me know if you want me to stop with these, but thought I'd add another sorting algorithm that I find very interesting.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 28, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #28 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master    #28   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files          79     80    +1     
  Lines        1646   1690   +44     
  Branches      290    296    +6     
=====================================
+ Hits         1646   1690   +44
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/algorithms/sorting/SortTester.js 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/algorithms/sorting/radix-sort/RadixSort.js 100% <100%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cca138a...150bb10. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Owner

@trekhleb trekhleb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! Thank you for your pull request!

@trekhleb
Copy link
Owner

@robtaussig don't stop please go on :) It is nice to see new algorithms in pull requests!

@trekhleb trekhleb merged commit 7198533 into trekhleb:master May 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants