• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    It begins when we’re born, strictly speaking. But, I suppose, around age 25, when we stop the development that started when we were born.

    If you compressed the physical effects of aging into one year, it would certainly look and feel like a terrible illness.

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      Not at conception? What about aged sperm and eggs? What about epigenetics and genetics? The continuum goes back a lot further in an unbroken fashion. Defining “age” as we do is an artifical conceptual barrier that presents as many problems as it purports to solve.

    • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      23 days ago

      Begins at conception, technically.

      Strictly speaking, we claim an age that starts at birth. But that’s not “biological aging”.

      People don’t usually start aging poorly until their 30s to 50s usually(depending on how well we take care of ourselves).

      Some call it midlife. I like to call it peak ripeness. Usually happens around 40 if you’re in good shape. And then it’s downhill from there.

      I personally wouldn’t consider aging an illness. Life is a musical thing, and ultimately the music eventually stops. The point is not to be sorry it’s over but to have danced while the music was playing.

      • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        22 days ago

        Not an illness? So cancer, dementia and Alzheimers are not illnesses but I guess some beautiful song for you?

        The diseases listed are age related diseases, and the person I respond to is glorifying death.

        Some people just do not take 5 minutes to think before they post what’s largely a “live laugh love” post, as a response against horrible sufferings.

        You can do better.

        • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 days ago

          Aging doesn’t necessitate illness.

          So miss me hard with your first paragraph.

          They’re certainly associated(related) with age but they’re not causally related.

          So do better? You’re obviously hurting. It’s okay to self care.

          • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            Well that’s what scientists argue about, is aging a disease? No one thought so 20 years ago, today more and more do.

            And age related diseases are, diseases created by another disease, aging. Or so I think. So very causually related indeed. IMO!

            Cure aging, cure Alzheimers, dementia and (most of) cancer.

            Sorry if I came off in an un-nice manner, I’m home sick, apologies.