• CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s great but emerging technologies are shooting for double or triple that amount, so why switch to something thats just barely reaching the equivalent potential of what’s already old news?

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        What EVs don’t work in cold weather? Cheaper for the manufacturer for sure, and potentially safer though its not as if EV fires are some major epidemic.

        • phx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          At a significant loss, yes. When it was really cold here that was about 30-40%

          • Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I can live with that, 100miles of range is more than I use day to day, so is 60miles. Winter road trips could be a pain, but that’s maybe once a year

            • phx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Yeah I’d be happy with a safer battery with a bit less range if it also means it’s more consistent in said range between seasons. It’s good to know you’ll make it to X next city/charger/etc regardless of temperatures

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I imagine vastly lower cost would be one reason. 450km range chargeable in 11 minutes would be enough for a significant proportion of people and likely desirable if the cost is low enough. I don’t think it’s likely that lithium would match the price/perf ratio of sodium so I think we’re likely to see a lot more sodium in applications that don’t require the absolute best energy density. So in a way, sodium might be the front runner, ahead of advanced lithium, in terms of what’s going to be adopted. 😅

      E: Also we’re talking sodium batteries in production. If and when double-triple density lithium or another shows up, it might change the calculus depending on price, safety, etc.