• 0 Posts
  • 89 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle
  • The 9800X3D is a desktop chip, so I don’t think it’s relevant here. We are talking about a complete mobile device after all, not parts.

    In my country, for around 800$ equivalent, you can buy a used business laptop with long battery life and enoguh performance for web browsing, video playback, and office work. The cheapest macbook neo I found in my country is also around that price (820$), and the better configuration is about 900$.

    For the lower price, I could get:

    • a thinkpad t480 with multiple batteries (hot swappable) and 32GB SO-DIMM RAM
    • a latitude 7420 with 11th gen intel with 32GB soldered RAM, a ultraportable like the neo
    • a thinkpad t14 gen 2 with 11th gen intel or ryzen 5000 and 48GB RAM (one SO-DIMM slot, and one soldered module)
    • or if the size format didn’t matter a thinkpad p52 with 64GB RAM and a 90Wh swappable battery If I went with the higher-spec price, I could get a thinkpad p53 with a quadro RTX 4000 and 32 GB RAM, 512 GB ssd, and a Pantone-calibrated display.

    All of them have more ports the the neo, use standard SSDs, and don’t come from a company that is one of the most hostile to consumer rights and right to repair .

    One of the few, I take it?

    One of many. What I meant (and should have said, instead of being vague) is that I don’t expect this to be a real shift in policy, but rather a way to maintain profits when people have less disposable income, and I fully expect Apple to keep lobbing against right to repair, even when releasing ‘repairable’ devices.








  • Point 2 and 3: If I already “leak” (should be: get my activities monitored and collected btw), then surely the most beneficial legal standard for the people (if one meant it as a safeguard again fascism) would be a ban on collecting any private information without explicit, affermative, expiring and unprompted consent?

    This technology has zero potential for fascist abuse.

    This is not “technology”, this is a law being enforced on technology. All laws can get used by politicians to push their ideologies, there isn’t a single regulation that can’t be used to push some agenda.

    Point 5

    There are already tools that allow parents to limit their childrens autonomy. It is the responsibility of the parent to make sure their child is safe, if somebody can’t guarantee that, they shouldn’t be one.






  • I appreciate that you feel strongly, but being this agressive and calling the other person “propagandized” and telling them to “educate yourself”, and not adresing any point made, just makes you seem irrational. You are acting like a redditor, be better.

    Read Marx and Lenin

    I’ve read Marx and Lenin, their work while fundamental to quite a lot of socialist movements, is now mostly outdated. Read something modern, there are more relevant analysis of workers material conditions. Do you want some recommendations?

    For one, anyone educated would understand that Americans are the best example of sheep in the world and that many Europeans are good second examples. The British for example with their high tolerance for a surveillance, laws that criminalize all manners of small trivialities, etc, etc.

    This doesn’t connect to anything I wrote btw.


  • China isn’t run by an “oligarchy” but by a dictatorship of the communist party via a mandate of the masses

    Almost all one-party systems meet the definition of a oligarchy. Also not via a mandate of the masses, not anymore, read about how Xi Jinping came to be the general secretary.

    they execute CEOs and rich people there

    You could have worded this a bit better, it reads as “being rich is enough to get you executed” and not as “being rich doesn’t make you exempt from capital punishment”. There’s plenty of those over there ofc, over a thousand billionaires.

    They need a police state to control the workers

    Bit irrelevant because all states seek to control the workers, that’s how states work. And why all communistic political ideologies aim to abolish the state at some point.

    Edit: To be clear, I agree with you in general. I just got bugged a bit by those three things 😅