• 1 Post
  • 129 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: December 3rd, 2024

help-circle

  • Several European countries paused or restricted arms exports with Israel during its military action in Gaza.

    The offensive was triggered by the Hamas-led attack on Israel on 7 October 2023, which killed about 1,200 people, while 251 others were taken to Gaza as hostages.

    More than 72,330 people were then killed by Israeli military action Gaza - including 757 since the ceasefire began on 10 October 2025 - according to the territory’s Hamas-run health ministry.

    fuck the bbc - I know I shouldn’t be surprised anymore but the audacity to say “well acktually Isntreal was provoked to kill tens of thousands of civilians in Gaza (or that’s what the evil Khamas health ministry wants you to believe)” in an article about it’s invasion of Lebanon is insane

    why not mention how they’ve killed hundreds of people in Lebanon - during a supposed ceasefire with Iran - so even if all those people were Hezbollah (spoilers they ain’t) it still wouldn’t be justified

    at least with the likes of Fox or GBNews you know they’re wackos from the start - the fact most British people are swayed to believe anything the bbc says is a crime against critical thought




  • idk what anarchists you’re around but all the ones I hang out with are vocally pro Iran even if they dont approve of the Ayatollah on principle - but yh I’d take mls over liberals any day of the week - I feel part of it is that anarchists aren’t a solid block so while some may block shipments other might fight against what they see as oppression that on a geopolitical scale can result in helping colonial forces - idk we’re all imperfect so I hope we can recognize that and through different means still continue to erode imperialism instead of fighting with each other at the benefit of colonizers


  • yeah that’s fair - but I feel they serve different purposes?

    like I see anarchism as a form of counterbalance to state power irrespective of where it is - without needing to be dogmatic

    as in undeniably Uruguay is materially much better now than its ever been (while still being at the peak of it’s colonial project even under socialist governance)

    same with Bolivia giving relative power to indigenous peoples while improving living conditions even under a corrupt government

    neither is perfect but vastly better than western powers seizing their resources and wage enslaving their populations - same goes for other socialist Global South countries

    and yet I see the value of anarchist “purity” criticism in that it should continue to challenge all governments when the time is right - even socialist ones - as at the end of the day we all want a stateless society - and until then I dont see why anarchism and socialism can’t strive to achieve that through productive structural tension?







  • Building power in our proto-branches hasn’t been without its challenges. Hundreds of members in Bristol and Islington alone have signed up, but we can’t connect with them because HQ won’t give us their data. Around 60,000 people – more than have been members of a UK socialist party since the second world war – have been paying dues for months, and proto-branches have no access to that money nor clarity on where it’s going. We’ve tried to make contact with HQ to advertise meetings, grow the branch and support members, but received no response. The Grassroots Left slate we’re standing on will change that on day one, delivering members’ data and money back to them, rather than hoarding it at the top

    Two competing slates have emerged: The Many, backed by Jeremy Corbyn; and The Grassroots Left, backed by Zarah Sultana, on which both of us are standing.

    The Grassroots Left has endorsed both Corbyn and Sultana as co-founders, because this is not a clash of personalities between the two, as some believed it was last summer. This is about resolving a political and ideological difference about what the party should be. Do we want Your Party to be a top-down imposition of Labour 2.0? Or do we want it to be a democratic, member-led, socialist party capable of bringing about the systemic change we so desperately need?

    hmm sounds rather divided but would be interesting to see