Is it simply over-correcting in response to western anti-communist propaganda? I'd like to think it's simply memeing for memes sake, but it feels too genuine.

  • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
    ·
    2 months ago

    What anecdote? I've made no anecdotes? The only person mentioning any anecdotes is you, e.g.

    Again, I’ve heard much the opposite

    Regarding USSR stealing industry:

    • https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0966692307000713#%3A%7E%3Atext=Introduction%2Cby+Soviet+Red+Army+troops.

    https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grabie%C5%BC_i_przejmowanie_mienia_poniemieckiego_na_Ziemiach_Odzyskanych#%3A%7E%3Atext=Grabie%C5%BC+i+przejmowanie+mienia+poniemieckiego+na+Ziemiach+Odzyskanych+%E2%80%93+Wikipedia%2C+wolna+encyklopedia

    (I'm sorry wo don't really translate that to English). But you can try to Google for sources in English.

    I’ve spoken to people from Poland that have the opposite to say

    You might've spoken to people who remember the late 80's fondly. Not 50-70s. Or ZOMO (secret terror police) or similar, they always had privileged lives.

    Unless you were in the Party, Army or Zomo, life was not roses at all, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_October

    The collapse of socialism in Eastern Europe brought skyrocketing poverty rates, prostitutuon, drug abuse, homelessness, and 7 million excess deaths.

    1. Poland is not Eastern Europe

    2. prostitutuon, drug abuse, homelessness <- you might be confusing that with what is common in the USA.

    3. Excess deaths https://wol.iza.org/articles/mortality-crisis-in-transition-economies/long#%3A%7E%3Atext=Features+of+the+transition+mortality%2Climited+changes+in+family+stability.

    4. skyrocketing poverty rates

    Not really, no? After we detached from the ZSSR everything had to be restarted and the first decade was hard. We had to start from little, figure out export routes, rebuild a damn lot of industries etc? We were economy attached and made dependant on USSR, how could the split not be hard?

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Poland, prior to socialism, was 2/3rds controlled by foreign capital, and was severely lagging behind the rest of Europe industrially. By 1948, Poland's industrial output was 153% of what it had been in 1938. Post-war, the economy grew over 300% from 1945 to 1948.

      In the 1930s, Polish life expectancy was ~46 years old. After the introduction of socialism, and improved healthcare, it reached 70. Before socialism, literacy rates were ~80% in urban areas and ~30% in rural areas. With socialism, total literacy rates were 98%. With socialism came legalized abortion and greatly expanded women's rights.

      The dissolution of socialism, as I said, brought ~7 million deaths around the world. You didn't dispute that, the argument seems to be on your end that these were necessary for economic growth. What Poland could have done is remain socialist.

      • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
        ·
        2 months ago

        Everything else tomorrow, its 1am

        The dissolution of socialism, as I said, brought ~7 million deaths. You didn’t dispute that, th

        I literally added a link it was 8400. You gave no sources. Trust me bro is not a source.

          • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Why did you send me a link to https://www.academia.edu/1072631/Review_Red_Plenty_by_Francis_Spufford review of Red Plenty by Francis Spufford, where reviewer names the genre science-fiction? The fuck?

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              ·
              2 months ago

              Because Paul Cockshott is an economist, and references real facts in his review. Just what I had on hand. Here's a grab from the PDF:

              Show

              • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
                ·
                2 months ago
                1. Dude. It is a review of a fictional book with no sources attached. How do I know it's fiction? Author says so on Goodreads.

                2. We were talking about Poland being conquered by the USSR and that it was better without it. The excess Russian deaths you're quoting - if they were true and not from a fiction book - still wouldn't matter for Poland being better off without USSR? Do you see the distinction between those 2? One is USSR, the other is Poland, and the excess deaths (I linked before) in Poland were 8400?

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  ·
                  2 months ago
                  1. The review is of a fictionalized socialist scenario. The author of the review is an economist that opposes the fictional allegories. This isn't complicated.

                  2. The source is not Red Plenty, which is fiction. The source is the economist Paul Cockshott's review of Red Plenty, which makes mistakes in its presentation of alt-history. This is not a difficult concept to grasp. Further, the point about the dissolution of the USSR causing deaths everywhere holds true, you see the 8400 people that died due to abandoning socialism as "necessary costs."

                  • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    The review is of a fictionalized socialist scenario. The author of the review is an economist that opposes the fictional allegories. This isn’t complicated

                    My bad. Still no sources for his claims in the review? Just a graph.

                    If you think that excessive deaths at the level of 8400 can be attributed to anything, you're wrong. I mean how would you even attribute them? The winter was cold, it could've been flu.

                    Btw. USSR flavour of socialism was nationalism/imperialism with extra steps. Forcing subjected satellite states to produce in favour of the Russia.