• 23 Posts
  • 167 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 12th, 2025

help-circle
  • One really important takeaway from this, as professor Marandi mentioned, is that the ceasefire is also time for Iran to replenish their missile and drone stockpiles and reorganize their forces. Yes, the US and Israel are certainly using this opportunity to regroup and prepare for the next strike as well, but Iran is not sitting idle, and they can continue to churn out munitions faster than the US can produce interceptors. He also makes it clear that the Iranians were largely expecting this negotiation to fail, so it wasn't some 'fell for it again' moment.





  • Interestingly, one of the biggest winners in the region from this war could be Oman. They emerged practically unscathed from this war, with all their infrastructure intact, and they suddenly get a cut from the Hormuz toll system that Iran will set up.

    Of course, tourism and international investment would likely take a hit, as with every other country in the region, but I think the new toll would more than make up for those losses, and they can take direct advantage of increased oil prices with their undamaged oil infrastructure.


  • SouffleHuman@lemmy.mltomemesIt's all China's fault you see
    ·
    6 days ago

    Didn’t the Vietnam War, arguably the poster child of American overreach, happen with the existence of the USSR as an active counterweight? It seems like an American habit to go gallivanting around the world in search of children to bomb regardless of external circumstance.





  • Iran's ability to externalize the consequences of this war (i.e. cause a global oil and economic crisis) is a point of leverage that the other countries invaded by the US lacked. This means that the war isn't likely to settle into the kind of stagnant forever war that characterized Afghanistan, bur rather force the US to either keep escalating or back down. I believe the US would keep escalating until they suffer significant casualties, which might create enough domestic and international pressure for them to formally offer genuine concessions.

    Alternatively, they (or the Israelis), may decide to go for the nuclear option instead. The same justification that the US used to nuke Japan, that they are fanatics in highly defensible terrain and thus too costly to defeat conventionally, can easily be repackaged and sold to the public for Iran. In that case, I can't really make any predictions beyond that point. I really, really hope that doesn't happen, but I can't dismiss this possibility either.