

Why is this a problem for you? The change is positive.


Why is this a problem for you? The change is positive.


Other people in this thread say physics simulations are inherently chaotic. If an AI model is trained on inherently chaotic data, how will the results not be chaotic or not worse?
Twitter levels are unattainable
I thought Session was decentralized and couldn’t be centrally shut down 🤔
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, in a recent essay, speculated on ways that we might “buy time” before the possibility that AI enslaves or destroys humanity. But meanwhile, AI companies have products to sell…
Anybody want to tell them?


I don’t see any reason to assume the ad blocker built into Waterfox won’t allow you to do the exact same thing… Or you can just disable it entirely, because it doesn’t actually have an incentive to make you use it.
Not sure why that would cause you to run away from Waterfox


Guy got in trouble because of the dumbest possible telephone game (among other things)
For example, although court documents claim Sanchez searched, “is the 900 mAh battery from a (Game Boy) capable of being used in a trigger device," Sellers said that was actually a search from [his bail] supervisor, who was cross-referencing real searches from Sanchez to see if they could be used to make explosives.
[Bail supervisor] Coyle then took a screenshot of his own search history and sent it to the district attorney, leading to a violation of Sanchez’s probation and his rearrest, Sellers said.


It’s nice that OpenAI is being pulled in the for-profit direction and the non-profit direction at the same time, and is threatened with losing (more) money if it fails to do either.


QA is when you vibe code tests, right


The entire article can be summed up in 5 words:
an Anthropic official told CNN
Notable other passages include
Logan Graham, who heads the team at Anthropic its AI models’ defenses, told CNN
and
according to Anthropic
And
Anthropic said
And my personal favorite
Anthropic claims… CNN could not immediately verify this figure.


Wired’s Maxwell Zeff wrote about a number of journalists using A.I. to assist their writing, including the Times columnist Kevin Roose… who [created instructions] to help Claude write in his style, including the “10 commandments” of writing like Alex Heath.
Can’t believe anybody takes Kevin seriously. Not here, sure, but there are some in the tech sphere who loves that he says what they already believe.


My solution to this is never using OneDrive, which (terrible as it is) can be uninstalled on Windows 10/11.


Mozilla allows the installation of ad blocking extensions on Firefox, and it’s already exhibited hostility towards the most talented developer of those extensions.


Aren’t you the guy who likes Eliezer Yudkowsky?
If you’re worried about brain damage, you’re self-inflicting it.


What are the chances the 10-second warning becomes a 90-second unskippable one?


Why?
If you’re concerned about anything that has even a snippet of code from an unethical company, you can’t use any Firefox derivative.


Nice of WaterFox to add something Firefox community members have been requesting for years!
This isn’t exactly identical to the extension, but hopefully it’ll be better optimized to run in the browser itself. That’s good on desktop devices, but it’ll be an even bigger deal on mobile, because Firefox isn’t exactly well-optimized with its addon ecosystem.
Sadly no, but the next round has not yet officially arrived to be shoved down our throats. It’s on its way though


Those quotes are nearly incomprehensible and they aren’t isolated incidents either. This CEO talks like every tech CEO selling AI products.
When you look at the term browser, it’s very antiquated in the sense that there’s static content, and when I click on the content, I get to the next link… With apps, it became more bidirectional. There’s more rich engagement with AI.
Instead of being a browser, it’s becoming a generative system, but it’s not doing it in a negative way that prevents the person’s incentive from creating the content in the first place.
CEO sure did say a thing. But it’s the interviewer’s job to say please explain what you mean" in response.
There is nothing yikes about this, is there?