@firefox, the “last privacy-respecting browser” now nags you with in-browser pop-ups to let AI generate “key points” when you long-press links.

Mozilla CEO: “AI should always be a choice – something people can easily turn off”

Then why the fuck is it off by default? Why the fuck am I getting pop-ups asking me to try features I didn’t ask for? That’s not a choice. That’s opt-out with a fucking marketing budget.

What the fuck happened to you, Mozilla.

They spent WEEKS in damage control promising an “AI kill switch” and then shipped it fucking disabled. That is the most gaslit UX I have ever seen in my life.

“Help me @librewolf - you’re my only hope.”

Settings > AI Controls > Block AI enhancements. Do it now, because they won’t do it for you.

Edit: a few corrections thanks to @Feyd:

“Hover over links”

  • It’s a long-press / context menu action, not a passive hover. That’s a meaningful distinction because hover implies it’s happening constantly without intent, which is way more invasive than what’s actually happening.

“Sending page content to ML models”

  • the default link preview (before you enable key points) just reads the Open Graph meta tags – the same og:title / og:description metadata that generates link cards in Slack, Discord, iMessage, etc. That’s not AI, that’s just HTML parsing.
  • even when you DO opt into the AI key points feature, it runs a local on-device model, not shipping your page content off to some cloud endpoint.

#Firefox #Mozilla #AI #InfoSec #Privacy #Fediverse #OpenWeb

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    ahem

    tap mic

    align notes

    adjust glasses

    Lying is not the same thing as gaslighting, you colossal fuckmuppet.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      if you’re going to play grammar Nazi with someone else’s imperfect English, at least exhibit some basic literacy yourself and read what they said.

      @k3ym0@infosec.exchange said they were closer, not that they were right.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        Did you ditch your original comment because:

        • You didn’t realize you could edit?
        • You were somehow unable to edit?
        • You accidentally deleted your comment and didn’t realize you can undelete?
        • You wanted to ditch your negative upvote count and move to greener pastures?

        I’m legitimately confused at what happened here; this is ostensibly the exact same comment I already replied to except that I don’t think you invoked “grammar Nazi” before. (Ironically: learn what the fuck a “grammar Nazi” is before accusing someone of being one.)

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        if you’re going to correct someone else’s imperfect English

        It’s not about “imperfect English”; it’s about lazily, selfishly abusing real therapy terms in places they don’t apply in a way that strips away crucial language from victims of abuse and genercizes it to absolute meaninglessness. I’m not going to argue the truth or merits of “closer” when they’re a fucking million miles away from what the word means; you’re upset with me for not playing into their fallacious relative privation bullshit, and I categorically don’t care.