• usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    ‘Man’ is often used in the same way as ‘mankind’

    Yes, which is why without the “a” it doesn’t work. “A small step for mankind, one giant leap for mankind” is nonsensical.

    He was saying he (a man) was literally taking a step with his leg, but it was a figuratively large step for the species because of where/how he was taking that step.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It would be redundant and self-contradictory without the “a.” That’s why it doesn’t make sense without it.

        You chill.

        • Ziglin (it/they)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I would still leave that up to interpretation. I think it can make sense however I am having trouble putting my interpretation into words.

          Two alternative redemptions of the ‘a’ not being present: It could be viewed as an ellipsis, it does sound slightly more pleasant to me without.

          And it would also just be really silly if the first statement said upon stepping onto a celestial body no human has set foot on before is a self contradictory statement is

        • athatet@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          But also everyone knows what he meant so it doesn’t really matter either way 🤷🏻