• Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    24 hours ago

    This has got to be the dumbest take on this sorry one could possibly have. Shame on the Guardian for publishing it so uncritically.

    There are zero downsides to the public for a healthy school lunch mandate. Pointing out that some kids would rather eat garbage for lunch does not mean that the government should pay for that.

    If the government is paying to feed kids, then it should be paying for healthy food. If some parents would rather feed their kids deep fried crap well… you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make them drink.

    I’d wager that the “concern” these companies (why do we have private companies in charge of feeding school kids again?) is really based on the fact that these meals are more expensive and so it cuts into their margin.