• Jmdatcs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Give them a few years. The belt and road initiative is set to bring levels of exploitation and wealth extraction never before seen. China gets shit done when it wants to and understands the long game.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This is pure projection.

      China is not debt trapping poor African nations. We can see that this isn’t the case when we can observe countries in BRI engaging in rapid development and industrializing, and this is confirmed by China forgiving tons of debt. The goal of China isn’t to make countries reliant on them, or to earn money from debt, it’s because China gains personally through mutual development. Here are some articles debunking the “debt trap” myth:

      There are many more examples I can use. China isn’t doing this out of the goodness of their own heart, but because they stand to gain from mutual development. A more developed global south means China is less reliant on the US Empire as a customer, provides new avenues to facilitate trade, and creates more markets for customers. The west harvests the global south for cheap labor and resources, and we can see hard comparisons in data between BRI participants and those imperialized by the west to see fundamentally different results.

      • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Don’t forget that China recently removed all tariffs from Africa. Meaning goods imported to China from Africa are comparatively cheaper than from other countries, which gives Africa a leg up in competition.

        bUt ChInA iS iMpErIaLiSt

        • ManixT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Are you saying that removing tariffs from trade with one region means you cannot otherwise be imperialist? That’s completely illogical.

          • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 minutes ago

            Yes, liberal, please put words in my mouth and down my throat. It’s the only thing you know to do with American propaganda.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yep! I mentioned it elsewhere this thread. Removing tariffs from global south countries is a part of boosting consumption, which is one of China’s more important economic problems it needs to tackle moving forward. It’s a win-win, African countries get to export finished commodities to Chinese consumers, and Chinese consumers get more access to goods. This helps build up African industry while also improving the lives of Chinese people.

      • Jmdatcs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 hours ago

        They’re turning an entire continent into a sweatshop to feed their own greed and consumerism. They learned from the best! And they’re improving on it through the strength of single party central planning.

          • Jmdatcs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            8 hours ago

            The measure they’re taking to address it is creating vassal states to turn into sweatshops.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 hours ago

              No? Where on Earth did you get that idea? They are focusing on raising wages and boosting consumption, lowering import fees from global south countries to help their rising industry, and are trying to boost incomes in the countryside.

              • Jmdatcs@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Lol, Jesus dude! Are you just plagiarizing U.S. state department talking points from the mid 20th century on U.S. involvement in Southeast Asia and other places in the global south?

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Nope! I’m an anti-imperialist communist that studies the world as it exists today. The global south is rapidly developing, boosted by trade and partnerships with China. Western imperialism brought stunted development to even negative development. Read the sources I linked.

                  • Jmdatcs@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    7 hours ago

                    I’m more knowledgeable about this that you could ever hope to be (do you see how statements like that aren’t even remotely convincing?). I’m well aware of the cherry picked information you use to support your delusion.