• 5 Posts
  • 212 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 11th, 2023

help-circle
  • Thanks, that gives me some options at least, even though there’s little hope. It went from plenty fast and healthy two days ago to basically dead yesterday, without much warning. At least as far as I could tell.

    I see these articles talk about “failing”, but what state would that have been? Should I have seen the signs and prepared? (Though I think “prepare” would’ve been the standard advice of backups, second drive, second location.)


  • It is an HDD and it’s about 10 years old, so I’m assuming the worst. I don’t know much about failure modes of hard drives, whether it would be mechanical, electrical, magnetism gone stale…

    Anyway, I’ll disconnect it for now, order a fresh drive and try to ddrescue the image to that. Seems doable at least.



  • Sunless Sea mentioned! Most of its value is in setting, writing and atmosphere, which are all really well executed. The gameplay was fun enough, but combat is tedious and I tried to avoid it, like you’d do in a horror game. I see it more as a visual novel with some exploration and resource management. Focus on the story, the characters, the locations. Fetch a macguffin only because it makes the story progress or because it makes you go beyond the explored world, not because you’re so interested in the act of fetching.




  • I think this is a difficult dilemma. My immediate instinct is that blocking illegal material is obviously an invasion of privacy. It is impossible to block one type of message without first reading all messages and classifying them.

    But on the other hand, we’re talking about other people’s servers here. They shouldn’t have to host illegal material. In fact, it is illegal for them to do so. So it is their right to know what they’re hosting and clean it out.

    Should we really have any expectation of privacy on big tech platforms? If you’re sending obviously illegal material in plain bytes to a Microsoft server, what do you think is going to happen?



  • Finally got around to watching (half), and she does explain it and gets into some real interesting technical stuff, so I judged too soon.

    I think she’s doing herself a disservice by opening with the dramatic reenactment though, because I bounced off on that, also on an earlier video. There’s not really a gradual buildup either, so someone who actually likes the drama will get a cold blast of RAM spec sheet right after and likely stop there. Better to let everyone know what they’re getting into at the start, right?


  • The title is objectively clickbait though, even if she does eventually explain the design flaw. But I think if she’s doing an hour on the history of RAM design, she could be honest about that.

    This is probably a matter of taste, but I can’t sit through 58 minutes of slow buildup just to get to “ram has to refresh, that takes 300 nanoseconds sometimes, you could eliminate that at the hardware level by making all ram twice as expensive”

    Thanks Laurie, but you don’t have to pretend all ram is fundamentally broken to make me watch an hour of maths and engineering. 3blue1brown does that all the time with titles like “What is a laplace transform?” and thumbnails of plain formulas on black backgrounds.


  • Can someone explain Laurie Wired to me? I see her in my recommendations sometimes, but I don’t click obvious clickbait.

    Take this one, is it actually a design flaw or is it just a compromise that was made for good reasons and is kept around for those same reasons?

    Maybe I’ll watch the video and report back, can always remove it from my watch history.

    Edit: It’s an hour? Not like I won’t watch hour-long videos, but that’s a lot to figure out if it was clickbait or not.