Furry artist, spatial data scientist, and streamer 🦝 My site: https://malleyeno.com/

  • 1 Post
  • 82 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 7th, 2023

help-circle



  • Even in the 2000s, many of the good servers on tf2 would ban for racism snd sexism. (Probably not homophobia tho). Gmod was worse for it, but there were still servers that didn’t allow it.

    And it makes sense. Even if bigotry isn’t a problem to you, bigots tend to be really fucking annoying about it. You don’t often find bigots that are chill with it. When you cut the bigots, you cut like 90% of the shit disturbers that made the game less fun.


  • Malle_Yeno@pawb.socialto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneimposterule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    I really wish there was a pictoral way to indicate preferred language without tying it to a country or making people think I like the values of said place.

    We could always do (ENG) or (DE) or something but that doesn’t offer much more clarity to the difference, and it reads as less scrutable than 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 or 🇩🇪 to me . Maybe something like (🗣️:🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇩🇪) would work?






  • Okay just for fun, I wanted to take a stab at trying to understand some of the examples mentioned in the article.

    We will actualize a renewed level of cradle-to-grave credentialing.

    We’re gonna do a really good job of making passwords (or degrees?) that last a lifecycle.

    By getting our friends in the tent with our best practices, we will pressure-test a renewed level of adaptive coherence.

    By convincing people we can do our jobs well, we’re gonna prove we’re really good at listening.

    For instance, a leaked 2009 Pepsi marketing presentation with language such as “The Pepsi DNA finds its origin in the dynamic of perimeter oscillations…our proposition is the establishment of a gravitational pull to shift from a transactional experience to an invitational expression …”

    uhhh okay this is tough. how about:

    Pepsi is known for waves (maybe lmao? i genuinely don’t know what perimeter oscillations is trying to say). We want to make people feel like buying Pepsi isn’t just buying something but is an invitation.

    Our device strategy must reflect Microsoft’s strategy and must be accomplished within an appropriate financial envelope

    oh this actually isn’t that hard: “Corporate cut our budget.”





  • I did genuinely think that this is someone attempting to parody academic jargon to poke fun at Butler. But re-reading the post seems like there can be something actually being said. But also in the context of OP’s title, I’m back to having no idea what the point is.

    My reading of this is: The responder says that in a lecture, they (which are Butler’s preferred pronouns since 2020. Not sure why the responder decided on she/her…) said the book “Wretched of the Earth” undermines the idea of “decolonization” by saying it (decolonization) grows out of deeply entrenched desires for states to hold “masculine” values (like ex. independence, fighting ability, not-being-subservient to others). These “masculine” ideals are imaginary and only exist as conceptions we have in our head. But even so, they are desires being chased even if states don’t explicitly say they are chasing them.

    These deeply entrenched desires manifest themselves through violence. Specifically, the kind of violence that only states get to do without major objections from anyone. Decolonization reframes (problematically, in Butler’s -alleged- view, if the responder is being truthful) this violence as something special that formerly colonized states get to do, in order to achieve “liberation”. Butler (allegedly) believes this reframing of violence in the quest to liberate these colonies will only entrench patriarchy. If true, that would make the current version of decolonization antagonistic to goals like feminism or gender equality.

    These claims are (allegedly) what they believe the book Wretched of the Earth tells us about decolonization.

    Where I get confused is by OP’s title. Butler is an outspoken critic of Zionism and critical of Israel’s conduct in Gaza. So how is their face an example of “how white people look at you when you don’t condemn Hamas”?

    edit: I didn’t mention how the book fits into this. Whoops. edit 2: the word “phantasmatic” or phantasmagorical has a bit of nuance behind it I didn’t really capture originally.





  • In this thread: Europeans being casually xenophobic about immigrants in The Americas and the dishes they bring from home, thus proving this new community’s point.

    Anyway while I’m on my European slander streak, let me tell you a story: One time i was staying in a hostel in Montreal and there was a French guy (like, a l’hexagon French, not Quebecois) there. He unironically said to me “A single tomato from France tastes better than this shit you call poutine.” That quote lives rent free in my head.

    Also you wanna know why he was in Montreal? Cuz he couldn’t get a job in France. peak comedy