Doctors can be so fucking stupid.

I’d rather die morally than live protecting violent rapists.

“We have to allow rape to beat the rapists!” -you

“You’re just anxious”

“You need to lose weight”

“That’s just part of being a woman”

What’s annoying is that we have representatives that think rape and sexual assault are well within their rights to do regardless of which side of the aisle they’re on.

Voters on the left care about these issues more often.

Good.

Hey you did it again! You took a single person from an entire instance and assumed they represent the entirety of a group.

I knew misogynist @hakase@lemmy.zip wouldn’t disappoint with more logical fallacies :)

I presume since you’re so fundamentally opposed to feminism and gender equality that the label “misogynist” is accurate.

Starting watching Love Overboard. It’s so perfectly trashy.

It certainly got a reaction out of you, so I think this art piece did its job here.

It hasn’t been approved yet - the title is misleading. The US has requested Reddit appear for a grand jury hearing by April 14.

Fuck TERFs

Clearly feminism hasn’t gone far enough.

It’s a logical fallacy to take a single person and assume an entire movement based on her views alone.

It’s not my job to coddle you because I’m a woman.

Yeah your single (female) boss represents all feminists and the feminist movement.

Great detective work there.

But only B randomly accosts male strangers on the street, interrogating them about the sex ratio at their workplace, and chastising them if it isn’t at least 50% female, regardless of what line of work he is in.

This is your definition of a raging feminist?

It is possible to support a cause, even emphatically, without being insufferable.

The original comment before the edit makes it clear this user has disdain for feminists that are too insufferable to his tastes.

Thus my skepticism at why he had to mention what year the tweet/artwork was from.

it is absolutely possible to move away from ‘raging feminist’ without moving one iota closer to ‘complicit in dehumanization’.

That’s not an objectively true statement.

You’ve completely fabricated that motive/intent, so yeah. Do you not know what “emphatically” means? I made it very clear that ‘insufferability’ has nothing to do with the ‘loudness’ of the actions.

Women can protest their subjugation as long as they aren’t insufferable about it.

Yeah, I understood your comment.

Your entire first comment boils down to “women should protest their inequalities in quieter ways”, so yeah.

Why does it matter whether it’s recent or not?