PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]

Hexbear’s resident machinist, absentee mastodon landlord, jack of all trades

Talk to me about astronomy, photography, electronics, ham radio, programming, the means of production, and how we might expropriate them.>

  • 109 Posts
  • 2.17K Comments
Joined 6 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2020

help-circle


  • I guess im just not seeing the maintenance issue as much as anyone else.

    I agree. Cars are absolutely ubiquitous. Nearly every tool one would ever need to maintain a bicycle can be found in any suburban garage. Not to mention, there are a handful of auto mechanic shops and hardware stores in every single town where more niche tools can be found. A calamity of one sort or another which severely disrupts supply chains might make niche materials and gases more difficult to obtain, but even in the event of a global nuclear war, there would be many surviving manufacturing facilities and the means to produce these things. There is an inconceivable amount of manufacturing capacity which is dedicated to consumer slop and industrial supply. A lot of production facilities dedicated to cranking out Labubus and golf carts and robotic vacuum cleaners can be re-purposed to produce staple items like tires, wheels, and ball bearings. Larger plants making automobiles, oil and gas machinery, etc can also be repurposed.

    It won’t exactly be efficient, but the obliteration of production for exchange value would free an unbelievable amount of productive capacity. If the markets which make these factories profitable go up in smoke, the buildings and machinery will still be there.

    Wooden wheels work for a bicycle, it just sucks compared to rubber.

    Compared to the old-school road tires which run at 90+ PSI, a wooden wheel might actually be more comfortable (ok this is a joke). There is a lot of potential in plastic recycling as well. Butyl (rubber) inner tubes are already being replaced with TPU (a flexible thermoplastic also used in 3D printing) in performance road/gravel bicycles.




  • The Liberals have always believed this. From their perspective, progress manifests only through reform of the institutions. As far as they’re concerned, anyone who takes action on the belief that the existing institutions are irredeemable and beyond reform is an enemy of progress.

    The Sisyphean nature of reform in financialized liberal democracies makes them incredibly defensive and bitter. Their plans for reform have been so thoroughly sidelined by the domination of capital that they are operating on time scales of the Bene Gesserit. In 100 years - as long as they don’t lose a single election along the way - they will have placed the right number of people in the right places to begin reforming the Supreme Court and to initiate some hearings about the possibility of funding research for policy incentivizing private development of clean energy.

    Their lives are dedicated to pushing the bolder one inch further up the hill, and when it inevitably starts tumbling downward they will blame everyone who told them it was going to happen.


  • I think it has some limited strategic merit. By doing this, they are ensuring that no country can cut side deals with Iran for oil/gas/helium/fertilizer deliveries. I think they fear diplomatic normalization and the establishment of neutral (from the US POV) payment mechanisms more than the Hormuz being shut entirely. The play here is to ensure the US remains the sole arbiter of who can trade what with Iran. It is a desperate attempt to keep the sanctions regime from crumbling by fait accompli.

    It doesn’t help them dislodge or subjugate the IRI (sanctions and an economic blockade were already the status quo antibellum), but it will definitely discourage other nations who are more eager to shift their economic alliances in the short term now that they are starving for these resources.

    It also gives them a bargaining chip in the next round of negotiations (not soon, but inevitable). Iran has effectively established their control over the Hormuz, but the US will attempt to use this counter-blockade to trade for some other more meaningful conditions.

    In the long run, there is probably a need to transform the global US sanctions regime from one of paper and policy to one of physical obstruction, as many alternative payment networks and counter-alliances continue to develop and mature. Each year the US is less capable of relying on aligned banks and institutions to prevent transactions they don’t like from taking place. We kind of see this happening already with the destruction of Nordstream and the naval blockade in the Caribbean. War is sanctions by other means.














  • Yeah tbf I only use Fedora for VMs and to recommend to non-technical people so I’m not the best judge of its quality. But my experiences of it have been smooth + no complaints from the non-technical folks I’ve recommended Fedora to who have gone through and installed it.

    This has been my experience more or less for the past decade. I moved to Gentoo on my desktop in 2020 so I could have better control of all the bells and whistles (trying to balance web dev, game dev, ham radio, astronomy, CAD/CAM, GIS, and gaming on one machine), but up to today Fedora has been what I run on anything I don’t want to fuck around with (like a laptop that I want to stow for a couple months, update the night before a trip, and not deal with any bullshit when I should be packing). I’ve also set it up for a few coworkers in addition to my brother, and they’ve been fine. I was truly shocked to hit so many problems in the installer this go-around. It is very uncharacteristic of my experience overall.