

That’s their problem. If they are using an LLM and cannot verify the output they shouldn’t be using an LLM
Yo whatup


That’s their problem. If they are using an LLM and cannot verify the output they shouldn’t be using an LLM


If you want a battle shonen find something else, I hear SAO is popular with those types. You’ll probably like the following season/latter half if I’m estimating things right but if you weren’t interested in the second half of last season you’ll probably not be interested in the rest of the story even with the fights. Fuse kinda sucks at writing them and to date they haven’t been adapted in a way that dramatically improves them.


Indeed, it’s just called installing there
Isn’t it also like opt in? If you don’t annotate a type it just defaults to Any, which is just unchecked like standard JS


Tell me you haven’t used a back button without telling me.
To TLDR you pretend the back button on android is the back button on your mouse, because it is. Does it seem useful yet?
Nah Ryuko generally just looks different but the easiest one is her hair, she’s got just a red “strand”. Also notable is the outfit, Ryuko wouldn’t wear anything with that neck thing going on 
What about the borrow checker needs an overhaul? Seems to do it’s job quite well. If you want to remove it then you should use like C++ or Zig or something since the borrow checker is fairly fundemenal to the design of the language


Yeah but that’d take effort and care about their work


In theory, but the gas tax isn’t anywhere near high enough for that so most of the money ends up coming from property taxes which ironically also aren’t high enough in the suburbs so they siphon money away from citities to pay for it


If I could trust that the people in government know how computers work I’d be down but well I can’t


As a Gen z who managed to not be an idiot I’m unconvinced it’s the technology when even in my elementary school years I was beginning to realize how shit the school system is. Technology probably doesn’t make things better but it was failing me in elementary school when the best of the best was the massive brick of a computer Macs in the computer lab was all we had


Here. Read this https://flowchainsensei.wordpress.com/2026/02/04/the-software-quality-and-productivity-crisis-executives-wont-address/
Executives aren’t ignorant. They have the data. They commission the surveys. They attend the conferences where CTOs present their concerns. They know that:
- 91% of CTOs cite technical debt as the biggest challenge
- 75% of projects are expected to fail
- 69% of developers lose significant time to inefficiencies
- Only 39% of projects meet success criteria
- The recommended 15–20% investment in technical debt management yields better long-term returns than crisis spending
Yet they choose:
- Not to allocate recommended budgets for technical debt management
- Not to make quality a strategic priority despite CTOs’ and developers’ concerns
- Not to mention these challenges in public communications to shareholders
- To celebrate AI productivity gains whilst developers report record inefficiency
- To focus on the next hype cycle (AI) rather than address fundamental problems
This isn’t a failure of knowledge. It looks to me like a failure of courage and integrity. A failure of the very concept of leadership.


That’s on the dev end of things but yes. Part of the build pipeline was re-obfuscation of your code so it’d actually work. Forge the mod loader just loaded the mods and provided code for modders to use. Forge Gradle was what handled the obfuscation stuff in dev


Consider for a moment the only thing we can confidently say they are reacting is things that would harm the perpetrators. They’ve redacted everybody but a victim time and again across the files they’ve released, frequently they’ll react a perp in one document only to leave it unredacted in the next despite it having identical content (namely the text messages as there is message text contents as well as screenshots). Seeing as they already fail to redact child porn and are definitely redacting things that’ll implicate people, including even Epstein I think you can make an extremely good argument they shouldn’t be redacted at all when it’s being done so plainly maliciously


Congratulations you’ve discovered that Mojang used to ship the game after it was obfuscated! Java has nothing to do with the fact it’s obfuscated that’s on Mojangs end, for goofy “This’ll allow us to sue people who copy our game” logic. NeoForge came out the gate with official mappings at runtime (non obfuscated using the offical names Mojang provides. Yes Mojang obfuscated the game and then gives us the names of stuff anyway…) and recently Mojang announced they are finally dropping obfuscation all together.
Edit. To make sure this is totally clear the obfuscated names such as class_5699.method_65313 is the actual class name and method name. The jar has a class named class_5699 which Java loads and treats like any other class. Very goofy and annoying for modders since if you wanted a useful name you have to first decompile Minecraft, then change all the names, and then when you compile change all references to said names in your code back to their actual obfuscated nonsense.


FUCK goddamnit Bitwarden


This’ll cover at minimum 2 arcs, and get most, or entirely through a 3rd (though that one is fairly huge)


They got their jimmies russled.
Couldn’t help but look through their history, seems they aren’t too pleased with life saying they like Ai more than people. Real depressing shit tbh, no wonder they are acting out like this


I mean it varies. It’s fun to just goof off in games sometimes. That’s why sandbox games like Minecraft typically have creative modes, sometimes you just wanna play in the sandbox and have a good time without the more typical game parts tying you down
Frankly I expect the kernel dudes to be pretty good about this, their style guides alone are quite strick and any funny business in a PR that isn’t marked correctly is I think likely a ban from making PRs at all. How it worked beforehand, as already stated by others is the author says “I promise this follows the rules” and that’s basically the end of it. Giving an official avenue for generated code is a great way to reduce the negatives of it that’ll happen anyway. We know this from decades of real life experience trying to ban things like alcohol or drugs, time after time providing a legal avenue with some rules makes things safer. Why wouldn’t we see a similar effect here?