Does this one have some advantage over [email protected] or [email protected] or [email protected] or [email protected] or [email protected] ?

And the Python programming language was named after that same troupe. :)

WASD in gaming is generally used with the hand shifted one position left of the home keys, so it would require a typist to continually reposition. ESDF or IJKL would be a better choice, and closer to what vi does.

Highlights

• Low neighborhood opportunity was associated with higher CDKN2A expression.
• CDKN2A is a key marker of cellular senescence and biological aging.
• Associations were strongest for social and economic opportunity.
• Results are consistent with models of socially patterned aging.

This post fails rule 4 as well. Except maybe for the handful of people who have been completely out of touch with world events for the past year.

Never heard of EFF

Congratulations. You’re one of today’s lucky ten thousand. :)

but 0 points for being 10 years late on this very easy and obvious decision.

Once you learn about what the EFF does, and read the post, you’ll (hopefully) understand that this decision was neither easy nor obvious.

Reminder: In addition to not being The Onion, this isn’t a politics community

I don’t own a google or motorola phone, so now what?

Campaign for your favorite phone manufacturer to make a phone with the features required by GrapheneOS, and when they do, make that your next phone.

Or use something other than GrapheneOS.

If you had read the post, you would know they have good reason for maintaining a presence on toxic platforms.

They recently announced a partnership with Motorola Mobility (a subsidiary of China’s Lenovo) to offer it on a non-Google phone. Is this what you had in mind?

Seems like they could be experimenting with an LLM to improve server-side anti-cheat.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=977US_SUGg8&t=4560s

Note that “rather undermines” does not mean “completely negates”. In any case…

30% less range for 60% less cost always makes economic sense.

Be sure to let everyone know when this new mix sells for 60% less than the current mix.

Ethanol does not prematurely dissolve seals and hoses on any car made in the last 30 years,

As far as I can tell, it’s closer to 25 years. Be sure to let everyone with an older car know when you plan to buy them an upgrade.

I get that Americans can’t do simple math,

Lots of assumption and rudeness in your comment. Please learn to be better. Goodbye.

The concern for most people is not the range of a gas tank. It’s about the fact that they’ll have to fill the tank more often, which means paying more often to travel the same distance, which rather undermines the claim of lowering the cost.

The price per mile matters more than the price per gallon.

And then there’s the additional cost of repairs when the ethanol prematurely dissolves your car’s seals and hoses.

Well, you could do this yourself too…

No, but you and someone else could collaborate to do something like it, if both of you had sufficient skill in this area.

And, importantly, it would require a great deal more time and effort.

The current laws are tuned to cost, benefit, difficulty, and volume assumptions that are made outdated by LLMs.

And it’s not just web development.

This mindset has been spreading for… probably decades. Nowadays, it is even pushed by certain popular programming languages, by including a toolchain that makes it as easy as possible to pull in third-party dependencies while offering a standard library so minimal that a developer is strongly encouraged to rely on said dependencies.

This inevitably leads to a world where software supply chain attacks have massive reach and high chances of success. And threat actors take advantage of it, of course.

Cindy Cohn (born 1964 or 1965) is an American civil liberties attorney specializing in Internet law. She has served as executive director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) since 2015.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cindy_Cohn

With or without ligatures? Without them, I think it’s essentially Fira Mono.

Response to your edit:

I am not among those who downvoted, but since you asked, I’ll offer a guess as to why so many people did:

1. The way you phrased your second sentence, it could be interpreted to mean that you consider the story to be inappropriate here. Perhaps some people (especially those who read Lemmy while in a hurry) thought that was what you meant. It could have been made more clear if you had written, “this was reported…”.

2. This story is relevant to people all over the world, while the complaint you received was that it concerns a US company. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. I believe more than a few members of this community, maybe even most, recognize that fact, and find it unacceptable for their news channel to obstruct information that concerns them just because the source happens to be in the US.

   To be clear, the rule here forbids “United States Internal News”. The rule does not forbid “News emerging from the United States”. Since the policies of a major global reference source like Wikipedia are clearly not US internal news, some community members surely recognize that flagging it for removal was inappropriate. I happen to share this view, and this is not an isolated incident.

   Once in the past, I submitted a scientific report, and it was removed here on the grounds that the scientists were in the US. The post was not “United States Internal News” and did not break any of the community’s rules. It was scientific research, without geographic or political boundaries. It was relevant to everyone. And yet it was denied visibility to us, the members here. I found that absurd, and deeply concerning: This community, which positions itself as a global information source, was filtering out information in a way that we have come to expect from state-owned media in authoritarian regimes. And it was presuming to treat scientific research as though it were somehow invalid just because it had been done in the US.

Edit:

In any case, I hope this helps you to understand some likely reasons why your comment received downvotes.

Those of us who have walked in the moderator’s shoes for long enough will come to understand that sometimes it’s the complaint that is misguided, not the target of the complaint, and that broadcasting such complaints (as you did here) gives them an air of validity that they do not deserve.

All the more reason to subscribe or donate if you find a station you like. It’s like public radio/TV in that respect.

https://somafm.com/support/