PugJesusM to [Dormant] moved to [email protected]English · 8 months agoAverage multiple choice questionimagemessage-square90linkfedilinkarrow-up1376arrow-down110
arrow-up1366arrow-down1imageAverage multiple choice questionPugJesusM to [Dormant] moved to [email protected]English · 8 months agomessage-square90linkfedilink
minus-squareEheranlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoIt were 2 nukes, the threat of much more, the Russian invasion and the decisive defeat in the pacific, including the total loss of their Navy. Not just one nuke on Hiroshima.
minus-squareIlovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 months agoYeah, it would have been more accurate to say Nagasaki.
minus-squareSpacehooks@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoOh i thought it was just the threat of more nukes.
It were 2 nukes, the threat of much more, the Russian invasion and the decisive defeat in the pacific, including the total loss of their Navy.
Not just one nuke on Hiroshima.
Yeah, it would have been more accurate to say Nagasaki.
Oh i thought it was just the threat of more nukes.