• MithranArkanere
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    How is it even legal for a company to decide what you can or can’t install in your own device?

    • maplesaga
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      The US supports monopolies as long as they have a backdoor. It was the same with Microsoft in the 90s.

    • brisk@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Because anti-trust has not been enforced this century, with the exception of Lina Khan’s work as the FCC director.

      Companies have been pushing the boundaries further and further for decades, with almost no push back.

    • Einskjaldi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      12 days ago

      For the same reason they can make you click agree to terms before you can do anything with the device.

      • MithranArkanere
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        Terms of service are unenforceable as nobody reads them.
        A contract cannot be valid if one side has not read it. If one side cannot guarantee the other side has read it, it’s their onus.
        Also, clicking a button that says “I accept” isn’t signing a contract. If it doesn’t have your signature or a certified digital signature, it isn’t a contract.
        It’s just an “I told you so” that allows them to kick you out, like the rules at the entrance of a restaurant. It doesn’t give them the power to sue you or anything like that. It’s just covering their asses with legalese excuses. Any legal practice that claims otherwise are just legal mercenaries for the wealthy.

        • Einskjaldi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          The legal part doesn’t matter, the important part is that if you don’t click yes, they control the software and you can’t install the third party software.

    • Skv
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      Ugghhhh, its THEIR OS you’re using. Perfect example is Nintendo.

      • kungen@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 days ago

        “If you want to replace Internet Explorer with Netscape Navigator, why not just use Solaris or OS/2 or something? It’s THEIR OS you’re using” didn’t go over too well with the courts.

      • fallaciousBasis
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        You mean the original NES which they tried in court to stop unlicensed carts and lost, right? Right?

        • Skv
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Moreso now with Switch 2s getting bans for using 3rd party accessories/those not working outright since they lack some baked in h/w ID that Sw2 checks for online