If you mean subjective because humans are the only organism that can communicate and understand. You can’t apply moral laws to inanimate objects or non human. So subjective in the sense that only our species has it. But, objective in that every mentally well member of our species has the ability to objectively identify a moral evil.
Rocks aren’t capable of morality, the only organisms capable of utilizing it are humans.
Then it’s not objective. It’s subjective to attributes of what’s involved.
Humans can only apply morality to other humans. It is an intrinsic individual law of order.
Which is exactly why it’s subjective.
If you mean subjective because humans are the only organism that can communicate and understand. You can’t apply moral laws to inanimate objects or non human. So subjective in the sense that only our species has it. But, objective in that every mentally well member of our species has the ability to objectively identify a moral evil.
Objective, is independent of interpretation or even observation.
Using morality and objective together, means you’re using at least one of those words wrong.
Going to sleep for the night. You’re wrong though, big time wrong