mudkip@lemdro.id to Mildly InfuriatingEnglish · 6 days agoSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moeimagemessage-square157linkfedilinkarrow-up1399arrow-down135 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1364arrow-down1imageSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moemudkip@lemdro.id to Mildly InfuriatingEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square157linkfedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarefun_timeslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 days agoIn a quota that uses integers and puts 100 as the average, a lot of people will be exactly average. Therefore it is incorrect to say that 50% is below average. It’s probably somewhere between 48% and 49%.
minus-square🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 days agoIf you require scores to be integers, this is true. If you allow for decimals, probably nobody is exactly average. :)
In a quota that uses integers and puts 100 as the average, a lot of people will be exactly average. Therefore it is incorrect to say that 50% is below average. It’s probably somewhere between 48% and 49%.
If you require scores to be integers, this is true. If you allow for decimals, probably nobody is exactly average. :)