In mice (of course) and human tissue exvivo. Earlier phase 1 studies with 15-PGDH has shown that it is safe and active in healthy volunteers.

Reference: “Inhibition of 15-hydroxy prostaglandin dehydrogenase promotes cartilage regeneration” by Mamta Singla, Yu Xin Wang, Elena Monti, Yudhishtar Bedi, Pranay Agarwal, Shiqi Su, Sara Ancel, Maiko Hermsmeier, Nitya Devisetti, Akshay Pandey, Mohsen Afshar Bakooshli, Adelaida R. Palla, Stuart Goodman, Helen M Blau and Nidhi Bhutani, 27 November 2025, Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.adx6649

  • NoTagBacks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    3 months ago

    Holy shit. Directly treating the cause of cartilage loss with pill-form treatment in human trials right now. The shit we’ve been doing with medical science recently is fucking wild.

    • chonglibloodsport
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Wow yes. So many older and retired workers from the skilled trades could benefit from this.

      It would also be a huge boon for recruitment as I imagine young people considering the career may be discouraged by the physical demands of the job and their potential lasting effects.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Arthritis is not limited to trade workers, anyone can have it.

        And it isn’t the only health issue physical work can cause.

    • roofuskit
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Perfect for making you work the remainder of your life. No more arthritis? Great, now work until death to pay for it.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        also cancer :)

        Any of the “regrows damage” side of thing scares the fuck out of me. I mean I want it to come and ASAP, but I also don’t want to play chicken with C

        • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Cancer is largely based on your genetics, except for extreme causes like asbestos or smoking. It’s worth the risk.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Not in this case.

            “Stem cells survive much longer than ordinary cells, increasing the chance that they might accumulate genetic mutations. It might take only a few mutations for one cell to lose control over its self-renewal and growth and become the source of cancer.”

            https://www.hsci.harvard.edu/stem-cells-and-cancer

            • Lemmar@lemmy.todayOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              The news article, as well as the published work, state that:

              Cartilage regeneration appears to occur through gene expression changes in pre-existing chondrocytes, rather than stem or progenitor cell proliferation.

              Long-term side effects will need to researched of course and there might still be stem cells involved in the process, however that doesn’t seem to be the case according to what we know as of now.

              • rumba@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I will gladly throw it on top of my monstrous pile of promising-looking research in hopes that it becomes a successful procedure.

  • SkunkWorkz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Bet soon I can buy this from a roided up guy in the locker rooms of my local gym. Middle aged power lifters would love to pop these pills.

    • musubibreakfast
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      “I just popped a kneecap, it shot clean off and broke a mirror. Pill me babay!”

    • Lemmar@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most definitely. I’m almost in that demographic myself and several of the slightly older, nerdy lifters at my gym talk about BPC-157 as something they would consider using.

      If this gets proven to work in vivo in humans I’m certain we’ll see the same no matter side effects.

      • blarghly
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve also heard the peptide hype. I’m curious, as an aging athletic person - but also I don’t want to roll the dice with cancer

  • Smoogs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    So…there’s a chance I can back into martial arts? Bring it.

  • wabafee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Damn mice’s at this point they will reach immortality first. Then again thankful for that lol.

  • SocialMediaRefugee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wonder if you’d have to stay off of those joints for months to allow the regrowth to occur properly.

  • SocialMediaRefugee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    The question is “Does 15-PGDH do something beneficial and would suppressing it have serious side effects?”

    I found this:

    15-HPGD has an unappreciated role in the maintenance of pregnancy. In mice, 15-HPDG has been shown to have essential roles in prevention of early termination of pregnancy and maternal morbidity. In 15-HPGD knockout mice, early pregnancy termination was detected.

    So any 15-HPGD treatment would have to be done with careful consideration of woman of reproductive age.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      reproductive urge, you mean.

      Plenty of women with the equipment and no intention of using it.

      • angrystego
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well, that’s part of what you’d have to consider. The reply didn’t state it would be contraindicated in reproductive age, just that it shouldn’t be applied without consideration.