California Attorney General Rob Bonta last night filed a request for a preliminary injunction in California’s existing case against Amazon for price fixing. Attorney General Bonta’s 2022 lawsuit alleged that the company stifled competition and caused increased prices across California through its anticompetitive policies in order to avoid competing on price with other retailers. New evidence paints a clearer and more shocking picture. The motion for a preliminary injunction comes after a robust discovery process where California uncovered evidence of countless interactions in which Amazon, vendors, and Amazon’s competitors agree to increase and fix the prices of products on other retail websites to bolster Amazon’s profits. Time and again, across years and product categories, Amazon has reached out to its vendors and instructed them to increase retail prices on competitors’ websites, threatening dire consequences if vendors do not comply. Vendors, bullied by Amazon’s overwhelming bargaining leverage and fearing punishment, comply — agreeing to raise prices on competitors’ websites (often with the awareness and cooperation of the competing retailer), or to remove products from competing websites altogether. Amazon’s goal is to insulate itself from price competition by preventing lower retail prices in the market at the expense of American consumers who are already struggling with a crisis of affordability.

  • Ruxiasdeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s needlessly insulting after I’ve been nothing but cordial with you. Me bringing up things that bring you discomfort to think about doesn’t mean I’m the bad guy here. Have a nice day, and enjoy your TV.

    • Alpha71
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      clip clop, clip clop, clip clop…

      • Ruxiasdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Are you here for discussion or just to make quips?

        • Lvdwsn
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Clearly the latter. Don’t let this sour guy dampen your willingness to engage meaningfully on this platform!

          • Ruxiasdeleted by creator
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            I won’t let it get to me. I insist on trying to get people to question themselves and the world around them.

            And to the point of the insult: I’m not on a high horse, as there is no perfectly ethical consumption under our current situation. I give money to companies who I can’t say are operating ethically. But we need to approach that and discuss that to develop our consciousness as a class. The “it was a good deal and I’m completely removed from it” is a thought-terminating sentiment that barricades us from developing our understanding of the world around us.

            To their credit: there are a lot of people insulting them. Their brain views this entire thread as adversarial now. I forgive them, as they are me and I am you. Solidarity always.

            • Alpha71
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Damn, that horse just keeps getting taller…

              • Ruxiasdeleted by creator
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                Solidarity always, best of luck to you and yours.