By all rights, this should be something I am deeply passionate about. I’ve been in tech/engineering my entire adult life and was obsessed with NASA as a kid. I even live on the east coast of Florida and can sometimes see the launches/landings over the ocean. But I just… don’t care at all. I’m not suffering from depression or any other malaise, and generally things are fine. But I haven’t clicked on a single link or looked at a single image. I know this has not been the case for many, many people, so I’m wondering what might be different about this launch (or really the whole program in general), and curious if anyone else has found themselves feeling the same.

  • Voltarion@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    We have so much problems down here on Earth that Artemis seems like a smokescreen. I see no way it could benefit humanity.

  • 0oWow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 minutes ago

    This system of things, all over the world, is falling apart. Going to space might be likened to a desperate cry for sanity. But a single cry of a baby in an ocean of crying individuals all over the world is not something given much attention.

  • alexquiniou@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So much problems to get mad about. Don’t have time to be happy for some people so far away. We are try to survive everday.

    Here are the reason.

  • KaChilde@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    For me, I just don’t see it as the step towards a bright future that it cone was.

    So we reinvigorate the world’s interest in space missions, then what? Every iota of evidence from our own planet tells us that businesses are going to own the moon, mars, and beyond. Wayland-Yutani is more likely than The Federation.

    I just can’t get excited about another frontier for Musk and Bezos to rub their stanky dicks all over.

  • evers
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You are not alone. What a waste of resources.

  • SuspciousCarrot78
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    You already know the answer, I think. It’s because they didn’t land.

    Orbiting the moon - super cool. Seeing new stuff from far side - super cool. Emotional investment in something we’ve more or less done before? Well…

    Which is actually a damn shame, but brains are funny like that. The entirety of human progress (and hubris) is down to chasing the next dopamine hit - and that probably includes the original moon shot.

    Artemis is asking you to feel the same thing twice. Your lizard brain isn’t stupid - it’s just honest and lazy. If novelty is the drug, then this isn’t a new drug. It’s a carefully rebranded rerun with better CGI and a press kit. Plus, you’ve probably had a lot of other proxy hits to the ol’ reward center so that something as big as “humans in a tin can fly around the moon” just registers as “meh - I’ve seen better on For All Mankind”.

    And I hate that for us.

  • Lemminary
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I don’t care because it doesn’t seem like a genuine mission to prove something. It feels like a purely political stunt. At least with the original mission, it was breaking a frontier on top of trying ot show off to Russia during the Cold War, but this time it’s only the US flexing as mandated by the Orangegutan in Charge because he can and it feels icky.

    • Stormy@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      His name is forever going to be associated with this too. Tainted like our lives have been with his toxicity forever

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    it would be more notable if another country went to moon instead of the US, although not interesting still. moon is OLD NEWS sadly and coming out at the same time as other stuff on earth.

  • MortUS
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Honestly, I thought for sure we would have had a permanent moon base by now. Something minimal but permanent and manned like the Space Station is. How foolish of me.

    • Ravel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      We should have gone to mars by now, but all the funds went to child raping fascists and bombs apparently

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        i dont think we are technologically there to get to the mars even with money, probably a few more decades of funding and research.

        • kossa@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yep. But that’s the thing, we could’ve been there if we didn’t spend the resources necessary for it on stupid things the last ~5 decades.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t care about it because it’s a NASA mission and I’ve noticed that anything American these days makes me nauseous.

    Call me anything you like, I don’t care, this is how o feel after years of america bullshit and decades of more murrica bullshit with their preprogrammed exceptionalism.

    I look down upon them, I pity them at best

    And then there is something as great as this and I just can help but feel like it’s tainted somehow. I know it’s an international collaboration, but still, the smell somehow remains

    I’m sorry, but fuck, so much misery and death and suffering has been brought to the world by the US for so long already… Trump is just the next iteration taking this place to its natural conclusion. Of course trump is corrupt, the country has been through and through corrupt for decades. This is just a typical self absorbed American grabbing the chance geven to get me myself and I to the top.

    So yeah, mixed feelings at best.

  • Strider
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I don’t think it’s all that hot what’s being done in contrast to what has already been achieved decades ago.

    So, once around the moon, Hm.

    On the other hand, stuff others already said. There’s so much stuff going in, imo the effort could be used in other places.

  • LoafedBurrito
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    I should be way more excited, but the current administration has ruined everything. NASA is too focused on creating a moon base which is dumb as shit. Let’s try and save earth before jumping ship to another planet.

    • SkunkWorkz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Advancements in space can advance humanity on Earth. Like practical solar panels were first created for a satellite. There are experiments that need to be done in low G or zero G like for material science, a permanent moon base could accelerate those advancements. Also experiments on bio printing living cells have been done on the ISS, zero G makes it easier to scaffold the cells into a structure. Maybe a moon base makes it easier to grow organs on an industrial scale.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      same, i think thats why its not interesting, the WHITE house has created so many distractions that the nasa isnt even that noticable, just a temporarly headlines that would be instantly forgotten in a few days.

    • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      NASA is too focused on creating a moon base which is dumb as shit.

      Why dumb?

      Even if you want a Mars base eventually, it seems like a good idea to get some practice building a similar moon base first. Many of the problems will be the same, but it will be much easier, cheaper, and safer to learn them in a place which is only days away from resupply.

      • quips@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah I’d argue time is actually the most expensive thing for a mars mission. And that’s going to require a hell of a lot of mission time nobody knows how to do yet. We get a head start on it now, getting a working lifter series in production and a functioning commercial lander and habitation scene and you’ll have a much better mars mission. I think the view of mars or bust asap asap comes from a lack of understanding of how big the technical leap is from doing a moon to doing a mars mission.

    • lechekaflan
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That goddamn scandal. The persecution of minorities and the warmongering. The socio-political climate now is far worse compared to the Apollo missions then conducted at the time the US government was unpopular mainly because of the Vietnam War.

      The arguments against Artemis aren’t surprising as these also mirror the skepticism towards the Apollo program.

    • Beacon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s more than that. The thought of us doing something incredible like establishing a permanent moon base feels more depressing than inspiring these days because enshitification will be baked into it right from the planning stages

      • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If the Untied States manages to survive the mess it is in, it will probably declare ownership of the moon and declare anyone else who manages to land there illegal aliens…including actual aliens

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Me to. Theres a podcast called “tech won’t save us” that i hate listening to because it reminds me how much we have lost.

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I get your sentiment but that’s exactly why we need space colonization.

          There is a thing called translatio imperii which means that empires aren’t created nor destroyed, they just move from one location to the next, always on the frontline of humanity.

          If we don’t get spaceflight, the US will stay an imperial entity for eternity. Only if space colonization succeeds, mars can become the next empire which means that the US stops being one, interestingly.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            That’s complete and utter bullshit.

            “Frontline of humanity” what does that even mean, historically? Humanity has always been spread across the earth.

            I see absolutely no evidence for this historically, what I see is just people in the Middle Ages trying to brand themselves as the successors to Rome for PR.

            The idea of Mars becoming an “empire” is pure fantasy. We can’t even begin to talk about the lack of natural resources when there’s literally no air. Maybe in 40,000 years or something, but not on any foreseeable timescale.

            If we don’t get spaceflight, the US will stay an imperial entity for eternity.

            This is straight up magical thinking. You might as well say that someone has to sacrifice a virgin goat on the night that the stars are in alignment for the US empire to end. There is zero logical or causal connection between those things, and empires don’t just last “eternally” unless somebody casts the right magic spell.

            • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Maybe in 40,000 years or something, but not on any foreseeable timescale.

              Similarly, the NYT predicted in 1903 that it would take “one million to ten million years for humanity to develop an operating flying machine” (airplane). The wright brothers achieved the first powered airplane flight sixty-nine days later. Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Machines_Which_Do_Not_Fly

              You might want to think about this.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                A technological breakthrough could make Mars colonization feasible. It might even be possible for it to be self-sustaining. Who knows?

                But an empire? That’s utterly ridiculous. You might as well say that the thing that the American empire will last eternally unless and until we genetically engineer a race of intelligent dragons who will replace it with a dragon empire, and if anyone expresses skepticism of that fantasy, you could just as easily point to “people didn’t think the Wright Brothers could fly.”

                One wrong skeptic a hundred years ago doesn’t mean every fantasy is going to happen. There’s countless predictions that didn’t come true.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Fuck that. Saying empires are inevitable is a lot like saying fascism is inevitable. Maybe it’s true but you shouldn’t identify with the thing and make it’s purpose your own

      • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Class warfare will be the foundation it’s all built on. Any tech developed for the moon, Mars, whatever - anything we gain in knowledge in return - is going to go to benefit rich fuckers, not you. One day there will be more space tourists. Rich people, not you. Maybe one day Man will even colonize another world. Rich people, not you.

          • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            In case we’re not familiar with the cultural/economic backdrop of Bladerunner, etc.:

            spoiler

            all humans that could afford to leave the planet had done so long before the period the first movie was set in, and those humans that couldn’t quietly, secretly turned into unpaid, unwitting sublime training nodes for each new model of replicant —until said trainees failed to recall their synthetic origins, and could replace the humans without any blowback, scrutiny, or awareness of it at all, really. 😶

            This is not scifi. This is where those fucknuts are aiming our species. 🥲

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ay?

          Do you mean only the super rich will be able to travel?

          The only travel anyone will be doing in the next 100 years or more will be going to the moon to squeeze into a tiny smelly hab module to figure out how to avoid getting regolith in your ass crack.

          I think space travel will be the exclusive reserve of hard core science nuts.

          Even in say 500 years. Will there be a “colony” on Mars with anything more than a dozen science nerds? I doubt it.

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m finding it hard to be happy about any of the positives coming from the US government these days. A couple of bright spots don’t really outshine the depressing everything else.