How we get off fossil fuels looks very roughly like this:

  • Generate electricity without burning stuff (wind, solar, geothermal, storage, and maybe nuclear if it’s cheap enough)
  • Electrify everything we can (electric vehicles, elecrified mass transit, ebikes, heat pumps for home and district heat, nitrate fertilizer manufacturing, etc)
  • Stop doing the things we can’t (a few industrial processes)
  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    They will “float some measures”. We’ll see what Germany and France will say. So far Germany is still pushing hard for ICE cars because they are to shortsighted to invest in EVs and France is blocking a lot of developments so they can export electricity from their nuclear plants to other countries.

    • BenLeMan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not shortsighted. Carbrained and corrupt. Also, the time to invest in European EV production has passed. China has got that market cornered now. German carmakers squandered any advantage they might have initially held on building bulky, expensive cars that the average person can’t even afford.

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        China has got that market cornered now. German carmakers squandered any advantage they might have initially held

        Yes, because they were good at building ICE cars and wanted to squeeze as much profit out of it as possible instead of investing in transition into EV. They still look at the next quarter instead of the next decade. So yeah, shortsighted.

  • spaceracoon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Would have been cool to see Europe starting this seriously years ago, instead of titering and waiting for oil situation to explode. But at least it’s happening. Now I hear friends and family back home that were not into electric cars, now finally considering getting one. Now that even the availability of gas at station is not a given. Brighter future!

  • fisch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honestly, sounds like a solid plan. The best time to start this would have been a decade ago. The second best time is now. To be fair, we already made good progress into this direction, bit we need to double down, that much has become obvious in the last few weeks.

    • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      We could have started 25 years ago at least. I remember watching the documentary “Who killed the electric car?” when it came out in 2006.

  • Buffalox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’ve been saying for a decade now that electrification is the only viable way forward. All our energy efforts should be focused on that.
    Electricity can be made in many ways that don’t require burning fuel, and that doesn’t release CO2. And electricity is in many ways the superior form of energy to achieve most common tasks.

    For instance a heatpump running on electricity made from burning wood in a power-plant, only requires half the wood to generate the same amount of heat as if the wood was burned to heat the house directly.

    An electric car similarly running on electricity from burning oil in a power-plant, still use slightly less oil than a comparable ICE car. Because the power plant is more efficient than an ICE engine, and the EV has very little waste.

    When you can produce clean electricity from wind turbines, hydro power, solar panels or even nuclear power plants, the pollution and CO2 generated by that energy consumption, is only a tiny fraction of conventional energy sources, like burning fossil fuel.

    Even steel smelters can now be powered by electricity, and AFAIK they are already working on implementing that in Sweden.
    Something I was told years back was impossible, which it obviously isn’t.

    It is way easier to make electricity environmentally friendly and sustainable, than it is for any form of burning fuel. Even If you can burn fuel without CO2 and pollution, that too can be used to generate electricity.

    The future is 100% electric.

      • Buffalox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well our politicians haven’t, because electricity has been heavily taxed.
        And recently there have been problems with the grid having problems keeping up.

        If you want people to move to electricity, you would want to make it advantageous for users to switch to electrical sources.
        But all we’ve had is that EV cars have been taxed less than ICE cars. But that’s only a single segment of energy use, although it’s a big one.

        • AA5B
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          recently there have been problems with the grid

          Also a problem with politicians. It’s not like it’s a surprise o r sudden

          • Buffalox
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes that’s the point, politicians and government are representatives of the people.

        • morto@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well our politicians haven’t

          They’re among the ones getting paid by the lobbyists ;)

  • panthera_@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    In contrast, Trump is betting on oil. This might cause the US to fall technologically behind in the development of green energy.