Who said anything about manual powershell scripts? Lol. Scripts are built one line at a time and the great thing about them is you can take pieces of other scripts here and there and add them to yours. Then… automate them.

As everyone recently we are digging more and more into certificates and automation. So… yeah part of the article peaked my interest and may help me find a good solution to monitor the 300ish certs we use.

I mean sure… but the know how to do it yourself via powershell is a perk. The other perk is not having to go through legal/ security to get another program approved on your network if you are talking enterprise.

Lol, I skimmed it enough to know it looked good. I will admit though the part that caught my attention wasn’t the majority of the content itself but a cliff note where you mentioned monitoring ssl’s.

I’ll read through this on Monday. Nice guide!

I mean, you didn’t address anything i said. You don’t understand what “real wars” are. Afghanistan was not a war and there was no way to win, hence any comparison you use to it is rediculous.

What are those drones or those defenses going to do about an naval artillery bombardment? Not high tech missiles, just straight shells hundreds of miles away?

I’m not a fan of either nation at the moment. You are just romanticizing anti America sentiment, which, you do you boo, I disluke them at the moment too.

I’m also going to ignore the Afghanistan in worse shape sentiment. If you think women shouldn’t go to school, be heard or be seen, you are not even worth having a discussion with.

“but America has dug such a hole that not a single other country is coming to their aid.” I mean, we are their with Israel. Not that I like them out agree with what they are doing. But that is a single other country.

" Hopefully you and or your kids are not within a draft able age, because it’s most likely coming if you see what they’re doing with increasing the age of eligibility."

This conflict with Iran would not require a draft by any means. Why would you think it would? Iran reportedly has 610k active duty personnel, while America has 1.33-1.34 million active duty personnel. With the arguable American military tech advantage, if this went to a real war, how? How do you think Iran would destroy them?

Say what you will, Afghanistan wasn’t a “real war” either.

I’m not going to say if we would win or lose in Iran. Again I DONT want to be their. The other major American losses you are mentioning were before the beast that is the American military became a large portion of our spending. The American military industrial complex largely came about in the past 50 years.

When the American military has a uniformed enemy and a target to destroy/apprehend we are one of the best military powers in the world.

Iran for SURE would have home field advantage. But if we went to war home field advantage wouldn’t mean much when we can park our destroyers in your pond, deploy a defense garrison on the ground to protect them and shell the country’s military emplacements to smithereens. Send troops in helos as fast surgical attacks.

The last military operation that we partook in that was a war action and not a peace keeping action to my recollection was operation desert storm. right/wrong or indifferent about being their we know how to do fast attacks against uniformed military. And that is why you didn’t see uniformed enemies fighting in Afghanistan. They used gorilla tactics quite well against us and we didn’t have an answer.

I’m going to be downvoted i know it. I don’t want to be in Iran, I don’t know why we are there.

But, what we are doing on Iran is not even close to a conventional/real war. If Orange Cheeto in charge hasn’t already done to much damage to our military by forcing the good commanders out, and we went to “real war” with Iran, boots on the ground and all. We wouldn’t be losing these planes. But at the moment we are hanging the planes/fighters out to dry with little to no support. So yes, they are going to get shot down. But you can’t call this a “real war”

If you are worried about just the sites you go to, use a VPN. If you don’t it is a lot easier than listed above to just see sites you go to. It’s a simple traffic analysis, most routers you buy at best buy will do that for you out of the box. Use a VPN. And always flush your dns cache when you are done. Even on VPN/incognito mode.

How to display all cached DNS entries on Windows - gHacks https://www.ghacks.net/2022/05/07/how-to-display-all-cached-dns-entries-on-windows/#%3A~%3Atext=Open+Start%2C+type+PowerShell+and%2CFormat-Table+-AutoSize".

My other post would allow them to see what you were doing on the site.

So I’m not an agent but i work in IT.

If i were inclined I would snoop traffic going over the home network probably with a packet capture with the ability to decrypt ssl traffic. So I would have tools installed on your computer/device to make that easy. This would amount for computers/ tablets and other devices that don’t have LTE/cellular connections.

To make sure you didn’t use the tor and other end to end encryption I would block those protocols on the network.

To make sure you were not going through other networks/hotspots I would monitor and get alerted to any new ssid’s at the house then blast the frequency that ssid is broadcasting on to make it unusable.

To make sure your phone was always monitored I would put parental controls and backdoor remote access and logging.

That covers a decent amount of situations I can think of off the top of my head.

Want to circumvent this? Use internet at the friends house on a secret device that your parents will never find out about so keep it away from your house. Use online personas, don’t use your real anything online.

“Send them home! Send them home! Force their government to take them with your amazing diplomacy skills!”

https://www.4000-tonnen.de/ More information on it

A presumption of innocence means that any defendant in a criminal trial is assumed to be innocent until they have been proven guilty. As such, a prosecutor is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person committed the crime if that person is to be convicted.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/presumption_of_innocence

‘Proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt’

I don’t need a jury or judge or prosecutor to tell me what my own eyes have seen. That man shot her. Beyond a reasonable doubt. He did it. The only semantics here are if he can get away with it under some stupid immunity rule. Even if he somehow gets off the charges, he killed that woman.

Manny pack was my first thought. Saw a ticktock about them some time ago

Oh I’m not judging or caring about previous relationships or drama. I was just after the facts after all the grifts floating around “go fund me for wife and son” raised a couple red flags when I thought she was the mother of 3. Turns out she was in a different type of relationship hence “wife” and the youngest was from a different marriage. That all sort of falls in line with go fund me. So sure I’ll donate some to help out.

I mean, if i was a prosecutor I’d show the video and say “you can see here she was clearly serving away from the officer who discharged his gun several times into the deceased. He was never in danger for his life. She was not a clear and imminent threat to others. Should she have done what she did? Should she run from the cops? Should she have listened and stopped? Those are great questions with various answers but not the point of the trial. The question is, should she have been shot to death for doing what she did? That answer is no. He is guilty of murder.”

So she does have 3 kids 15, 12 and 6. First marriage had the first two and the second marriage had the final one. Second husband died and they are looking to raise money for the son and common law(?) Spouse.

So maybe the first two children are with the first father still?

I read somewhere that she was a mother of three? Or did this son have a different dad? Just trying to make sense of the information floating about.

Worth the watch. Love the idea of digging into a hill for the base of the smoker.

That’s the thing. We already knew he was a womanizer, pedophile, rapist. Maybe taking about something new will make the right finally snap out of it because they don’t care about the fore mentioned things

Angry growl vs questioning growl. Two totally different growls. I’m sure there is a community around here that could go into more detail for you.