I’d give 100% of my paycheck to a child that eats pedophiles

There are different kinds of dangerous drivers. The kinds you don’t want behind you are usually either easy to pass and leave far behind or easy to let pass you. My whole premise is based around the first kind, that is driving negligently slower than the flow of traffic. Anyone staying behind them (read: you) would then also be driving negligently. Since they’re, as established, going way too slow, they are very easy to pass and get plenty of distance between without adding an extra hour onto my and every other driver’s commute.

As explained elsewhere in these replies, the biggest fear from being in front of this kind of driver is being directly in front of them and getting rear-ended at a stop when they’re not paying attention, but if I can overtake them, that means I can just stay in a different lane from them and there’s no real concern.

Like I said I’m a different reply, It’s not in anyone’s best interest for me to go 15 to 30 mph below the flow of traffic just because I ended up behind someone who doesn’t know they’re on Earth much less operating an automobile. If there’s a legal way to pass them, I’m going to. Once they’re behind you, you only have to worry about getting rear-ended at a stop, which is only an issue in slower city traffic where it is easier to keep an eye on someone behind you. In which case, just stay in the lane you used to get around them.

If they’re driving erratically, however that’s another story and I definitely agree that I want to stay as far back from them as I can. But they’re usually speeding and my whole point is centered on the premise of being stuck behind a slow inattentive or otherwise neglegent driver. They don’t even need to be a bad driver, maybe they’re new to the area, looking for parking, having a medical issue, etc. Just pointing out that not all overtaking is about getting there first.

Yes I was a mail carrier, I’ve driven professionally. Which means I also know how to most safely and efficiently get to my destination, and neither involve being at the whims of a dangerously negligent idiot going 30 mph slower than the flow of traffic. 🤷‍♂️

Well I’m not rich and I want money spent on NPR, and the people allocating my taxes won’t let that happen, so this is a win.

I mean the chances of every dumb person in the world not having dyslexia are pretty slim, but yeah, it’s not a cause-and-effect thing.

The options under discussion are pass and not be involved in a wreck or stay behind and wait to be involved in a wreck and somehow the second option is more appealing to you? Yeah no thanks, I’ll pass and avoid it entirely instead of waiting for it to happen, hoping it happens in a predictable & easy-to-avoid way, hoping that every other driver on the road with us is also waiting for it to happen, hoping we all have perfect reaction time, hoping all our cars respond properly, and hoping that road conditions are “ideal.” That’s a lot of luck. If you can predict how and when a bad driver is gonna crash, you go ahead and caravan with them, I know I personally can’t see the future so I’m going to get as far away as I possibly can.

This doesn’t take into account the vast safety benefits of getting away from incompetent/inattentive drivers. I’m not necessarily passing you to “get there” faster, it’s pretty easy to tell when a driver has no clue what they’re doing and I don’t want to have anything to do with that shit.

I actually have no clue if it doesn’t take that into account, I didn’t read the article, but you see what I’m saying.

Squibs

Everything on it is a gas

Yeah, like it can’t be consensually fucked in the ass, it’s untoppable. DoN’t WoRrY tHeY’lL wAiT

Wow what an argument, very convincing 🙄

A flat swimming pool wouldn’t hold any water, you’re thinking of a parking lot

No sear=no maillard=waaaaay less flavor. Also braising things usually aren’t fully submerged, so they can actually keep developing maillard in the oven. Wine, stock, and beer all also have and impart actual flavor, unlike plain water. Of course you can boil with those things, but then you need a lot more of them, which is more expensive/wasteful. Drastically different results using different ingredients and equipment means not really samey at all imo.

You would add cordyceps on top coming out of his head

Because Tsunami Three already happened and Tsunami Five hasn’t happened yet

Nice, can I borrow it? Sounds like a good read

“The Charlie Kirk Act… addresses restricts free speech”

Fixed that for them

Right, you just literally said Trump wasn’t a problem, which is quite obviously false. I know what you meant, but it sounded bad.

There can be two problems