This is real?

Show more

attach women

Did you mean ‘attack’?

They’re involuntarily gritting out their words every time the noice happens.

For short clips, I think that this kind of “this guy said this” content is very achievable for AI - example (tbf this one is still ‘person-based’ as it’s motion capture controlled)

Thanks for attempting to explain it.

You seem to have gotten Gemini and Claude mixed up? Your previous comment only mentioned Gemini.

Bolding mine:

If the article mentioned a “bullet that killed Charlie Kirk,” it is likely referring to a viral piece of misinformation or a specific satirical news story. Charlie Kirk is alive; therefore, any article claiming he was killed by a bullet is either: Satire: (e.g., The Onion or The Babylon Bee style content). Misinformation: A hoax designed to trigger a reaction.

Um, does Gemini not know that Charlie Kirk is dead?? (Yes I know AI doesn’t really “know” things)

The neck folds look identical to me.

This reminds me of the Saw puppet.

I saw the movie, it was very enjoyable.

Eh, to each their own I guess. I don’t like how snug the bodice looks, nor am I a fan of constantly managing my leg positioning and monitoring the breeze lest I expose myself - and that is without even mentioning sun protection. But you do you.

Compares dressing for presentation vs dressing for comfort

“Lol genders amirite”

Ow, my heart!

Yes, but I only have a source in Swedish (specifically the later part of the video). To summarize: The national media SVT has this ‘task-force’ that verifies/debunks claims being spread on social media. In the video I linked to, they compare the clip Israel posted of Netanyahu getting coffee with pictures the cafe took and earlier posted pictures of the cafe. The same was done for the outside of the cafe shown in a different clip. Everything was highly consistent and unlikely to be AI. The only oddity, a disappearing ring, is likely due to video quality and/or hand positioning.

Pretends to care about nuance by positing children could be murderers

Blatantly ignores 43 confirmed innocents killed mentioned in own comment

What? Why wouldn’t they use the data they already have? The only way you would find that uncanny is if you assumed that data submitted to a company in one context is never re-used outside that context. No such promise was ever made; On the contrary, I seem to recall that we were told from the start that model building was the goal.

Niantic has pulled sheisty moves, but this isn’t one of them.

For those who are unfamiliar (like me): Skeumorph

🎶The Night, she calls meee🎶 (Bonus: Animation)

According to the article, it’s to target their respective vertebrate predators. Convergent evolution is the term of the day.

That’s different, the AI can’t generate paper. /s