he/him

DSA ✊

Ally 🏳️‍🌈

  • 63 Posts
  • 273 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 16th, 2025

help-circle









  • Me: provides evidence from the CIA itself, directly related to the topic on hand

    Another user: provides evidence that many/most ex-soviet citizens actually preferred Socialism vs the Shock Capitalism they experienced. (Read Shock Doctrine and Blackshirts and Reds)

    You: nuh uhh! My great grandparents told me a story once!

    How to summon the .ml warrior with this one simple step.

    Yes indeed. I fight against misinformation and for human rights. I support and march alongside strikers. I confront Proud Boys and other fascists. I resist against ICE. I fight for LGBTQ+ and BIPOC rights. I am active in mutual aid in my community. I’ve helped put Progressives and Socialists in elected office. I’m organizing my community against fascism and capitalism that ruins our lives.

    You? Well … what have you accomplished lately?

    That we’ve actually still have accounts of those who witnessed and experienced it first hand.

    Yes of course. And there’s Cubans in Miami who denounce Cuba. Nevermind that these people are all ex-land owners, factory owners, and capitalists who exploited the working class for their own benefit. Castro was kind enough to exile them instead of what Mao did.


    Myth: Communism Killed 100 Million+ People

    Debunked:

    Death tolls often include WWII casualties, famines, and natural disasters, misattributed to communism.

    Capitalist atrocities (Native American genocide, transatlantic slavery) dwarf these numbers.

    Sources like the “Black Book of Communism” are ideologically biased and widely discredited.


    Myth: “Communist countries have no food!”

    Busted:

    Famines (e.g., USSR 1921) were caused by war/sanctions, not socialism.

    Socialist states often had better nutrition than capitalist peers (e.g., Cuba’s food security vs. US food deserts).

    Capitalist countries waste 40% of food while millions starve.


    A good book to read is Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism by Kristen Ghodsee. So yea, read some books. Or rely on anecdotes 2 generations removed lol

    Blocking you, I have no desire to continue this thread.





  • John@lemmy.mltomemesWho could have seen this coming
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    It’s always a catch 22 with crypto-skeptics, in my experience. I try to be vague enough so people simply understand the use cases and why there’s excitement for the tech, but then if I get too technical it “gets nebulous” since there’s lots of jargon. Very difficult to find the middle ground. In most cases, simply using the tech will clear up 99% of people’s questions … at least that’s how I got into it as a former skeptic myself.






  • John@lemmy.mltomemesWho could have seen this coming
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    NFT-haters love to point out that the thing you ‘own’ is the blockchain token, not the actual art asset itself. I always find this argument silly since:

    1. the token is the whole point. The NFT revolution (or mania, if you want to call it that) is because the tokens are the enabling technology. Where the art itself actually lives is just secondary. Nobody is getting excited about the JPEGs themselves, not really (let’s be real, most of the “art” is dogshit). People got excited about what the tokens enabled. Just one example, I can send all owners of my photos (the tokens) additional art as a bonus thank you. I know exactly who has my tokens. I can also gate premium features (similar to Patreon) to token holders. This functionality is how Ticketmaster is exploring NFTs

    2. If I buy my digital wedding photos, or something on DeviantArt, or wherever, and if I lose that asset (computer wiped, whatever), I can just go and redownload it. It’s a copy. Of course it is. We live in a digital age. I don’t really understand why NFT-haters rave all the time about owning copies of the assets. Of course it’s a copy. Even onchain art assets are just ‘copies’ since it’s decentralized over 1000s of computers


    Isn’t that like owning an original photo?

    Anybody who’s ever used the technology will understand this immediately. Anybody who has actually bought/used NFTs understand how silly these ‘well technically…’ arguments are.

    What a good argument would be would be the distinct between ownership and possession:

    ownership = rights (human law, rulings/opinions, enforced top down. i.e. titles)

    possession = control (physics laws, math, enforced bottom up i.e. car keys)

    crypto IMHO was never about the former. “Ownership” will always live in the layer of social agreement. What crypto gives is “possession”: control above the TOS and paper rights that web 2 gave us. The first time the user can possess the keys to his stuff on a database that’s shared with other people (and not just the illusion of). This distinction is the reason why even though you do “own” your digital song/videos/game loot on amazon or PS5 via their TOS, you cannot trade it, swap it with a friend, resell it… The key never left your digital landlord, they just let you in to play. You had the papers for your car, but not the key. You never possessed what you owned.


  • John@lemmy.mltomemesWho could have seen this coming
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    In your opinion, how is that functionally different than when I sold photos on DeviantArt, and they got an email instead of a token? Are NFT-haters upset that art is being sold at all? Or are they upset about the delivery system?

    bought art and also given out/received pointers to the receipts as NFTs.

    I have NFTs with assets on chain as well, so in fact those ones aren’t just “pointers”.